WS is right.
I'm not an s-type, but I'm a female. Your approach is that of a person who thinks they are going to come across a cock-gobbling female who has the attitude of 'any cock will do'. Now, I know there are some things that make people believe there are just TONS of women who are willing to open their mouths for any of the ~3.5 people on the planet with a penis, there's nothing about this that should lead anyone to believe that your penis is the one that brings such desire out.
You contradict yourself. (Save one. We'll get to that in a sec.)
You have already admitted that you would NOT approach a woman in this way in real life. If that is the case, why would you approach a woman that way electronically? When you do, WHY would you be surprised when you get the same crap results as you would expect when the woman is in front of you?
You say it's a dating site. Have you ever asked a woman on a date, and thrown in there, 'hey, btw, how's your gag reflex?" If you propositioned a hundred women for a "date," how many of them do you think would accept the invitation, when the whole thing pushed up to the forefront is that you want your cock blown? Most women, kinky or not, want something more than that. You are not providing the 'something more'.
You are completely incorrect in your statement of 'we ALL know what we're here for.' You do not consider in the slightest that people might not was sex or kink as the forefront of their interactions. Believe it or not, some people want emotional attachments. However, since the implication of your words is about you getting your dick serviced, you're blowing from the beginning.
(I promised I would.) You ARE correct about being inexperienced and in this particular instance, I'm not even talking about the lack of reference to topping, Dominating, or other kink. (Something you happen to make no reference to in your profile, except knowledge of your one particular kink.) However, there is good news for you. There is a TON of reference material out there about how to be more successful in regard to response rate when contacting people online. On this site alone, there are (I don't know how many) threads related to the subject of 'why won't women answer email?' The cool part about such threads is that women will tell you what type of approach they respond to. Always listen to your target audience. They know what you want to know and are giving you the information to help you get a better response rate.
Personally, I'm also a fan of the research that OKCupid has done over the years. They did data analysis on what types of approaches were more likely to get a response based on actual replies. Everything from which greeting, (hi, hello, good morning, salutations, etc) is most likely to get a response to things like what were the top ten unique words in the body of a message that had the highest percentage of replies for a first contact. (For the Walking Dead fans, the word "zombie" has consistently stayed in the top five over the last few years.) References to what type of music a person listens to, which movie they last watched in a theater, and what book they have read in the last year get vastly better response rates. They discuss what kind of first contact messages are considered too long or too short, the importance of at least one of the sentences being in the form of a non-sexually related question, and is there something related to the profile of the person being contacted in the message. Tons of data that a person can use to improve their approach. So much data, in fact, that they published a book.
One other matter that has to be considered is your medical condition. Kinky people are still people and some people will not consider dating people with a physical disability. This can effect your response rate as well. What you might consider doing is looking at your response rate when compared to the average and see whether you are doing well or not as compared to other men in your category.
ETA - If I am correct, the profile literally changed in the amount of time it took me to write a response. I'm going to leave my post as is.
If the OP were to ask me, I'd guess (roughly) it's a weight of a buck 25, or a buck 30. A person without the ability to weigh themselves can make an estimate of what they weigh depending on what size pants they wear. Unlike women's clothes that vary from size to size depending on the manufacturer, most male clothing (pants, suits) are measured in specific inches. There are charts you can use that, when you supply clothing size in relation to your height, you can get an approximate weight.
< Message edited by LadyPact -- 10/15/2017 1:10:25 PM >
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT
Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD
Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.
Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread