MasterJaguar01
Posts: 2323
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BoscoX
"Time to move on" because we're about to find out why hag Pelosi barred Jim Jordon from her personal little private witches coven
"Why did Pelosi fail to provide adequate security as President Trump requested" is a question that can now be pursued
Jim Jordan Goes NUCLEAR After Pelosi Blocks Him From Jan. 6 Committee
ROFL....
Jim Jordan at his moronic best
This what happens when we gerrymander districts
This guy starts out by BASHING the very committee from which he whined about being banned. He brings up crime and inflation, because they are 100% relevant to the Jan 6th insurrection. Then he plays the completely moronic and widely empirically debunked "Nancy Pelosi security" card.
This is one of the reasons he was banned. He contributes NOTHING to the committee. He spends the committee's time having childish temper tantrums, and going on completely factless, revisionist diatribes. He does so in this very video! Also, watch him on other committees! He asks no relevant questions. Rather he just talks for minutes on end, citing completly false revisionist nonsense on past events.
1. Talks about crime going up. - Ummm... local mayors and governors are in charge of that... And that releates to Jan 6th, how?
2. Talks about inflation (and omits the complete Republican inaction to addressss the supply chain crisis when they were in power) - And that relates to Jan 6th how?
3. And then the Nancy Pelosi security nonsense. Yes that is helpful, right?
Let's just say, that the rules of the House require the Speaker to be the Chief Security Officer (they don't). Let's also assume that your queen, Nancy Pelosi dropped the ball here. ok. Are you saying lack of adequate security caused the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers to organize an attack on the capitol? oh BTW: AND to stockpile huge caches of arms in nearby hotels?
BTW: The Seargent at Arms of the House - the guy who was ACTUALLY in charge of security, was fired.
You listen to this moron and follow his every word because you think he is some kind of great mind.
He is almost 100% completely worng in what he says. (And I mean flat out wrong)
He is either:
1. Just so incredibly stupid that he should always just STFU
2. A complete blind partisan hack that would do anything to preserve his own fame, wealth, and power
3. A combination of both
Personally, I think it is mostly #2, and some of #1.
Also... Look at one of his seditious texts he forwarded to Mark Meadows, trying to get Meadows to get Mike Pence to overturn the elctoral college vote.
Keep in mind, he is no constituional scholar, or scholar of American history at all. He wouldn't know a Federalist paper from a piece of toilet paper. He did not write this. He seditiously forwarded it
quote:
“On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all – in accordance with guidance from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedence. ‘No legislative act,’ wrote Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78, ‘contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.’ The court in Hubbard v. Lowe reinforced this truth: ‘That an unconstitutional statute is not a law at all is a proposition no longer open to discussion.’ 226 F. 135, 137 (SDNY 1915), appeal dismissed, 242 U.S. 654 (1916). Following this rationale, an unconstitutionally appointed elector, like an unconstitutionally enacted statute, is no elector at all.”
First of all, Mike Pence had no auithority whatsoever to call anything out and override electoral votes. - Jim Jordon knew this
Secondly, nothing could be MORE constituional, then following the constitutionallly prescribed process for choosing the President.
Thirdly, the author refers to an "unconstituionally appointed elector". All electors were constitutionally appointed and approved by their states. - Jim Jordon knew this
Lastly, the idea that anyone could make a judgment as to the Constitutionality of any official proceeding and thereby nullify that proceeding is so completely absurd, it is laughable.
"Sorry you can't arrest him for the robbery you just saw him commit, because I am calling it out as unconstitutional, and therefore, no arrest at all. "
This is the GREAT mind that the GOP wanted on the comittee.
He was banned because he is a partisan hack, guilty of the very sedition the committee was investigating.
PERIOD.
< Message edited by MasterJaguar01 -- 1/17/2023 11:50:41 AM >
|
RE: Jan. 6 panel refers Trump on criminal charges - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread