quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01


There were members of the J6 committee from two parties

I can no longer justify wasting my time on you, as you are willfully blind.

Have I said something that is incorrect? Were there members of only 1 party? No.

Liz Cheney has been a lifelong Republican and guzzler of the neocon kool-aid., saying the most moronic Republican things she could say, her entire career. I don't know anyone who could be more Republican.

Does she not count, because she called BS on trump?

Please explain...

1. How this committee is not bipartisan (I already provided the link to the definition)
2. Your legal theory supporting your assertion that the subpoena is unlawful.

quote:


Republicans in bi-partisan committees MUST be approved by Boscox BEFORE subpoenas can be issued.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
So, what next, after a Soviet-style show trial?

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
So, what next, after a Soviet-style show trial?

A Soviet style show trial, with 98% of the testimony coming from lifelong Republicans and Trump aides, including trump's own family. (and their text messages and emails)

With Trump himself invited and subpoenaed to testify. But of course he refused and bragged that the subpoena was withdrawn and then whined some more on Truth Social.

I bet Russian citizens in the former Soviet Union would beg for a trial that fair!

quote:

The Jan. 6 Committee established by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi last July is no mere investigation into the disgraceful events of that day. It is a far more ambitious undertaking.


The committee has embarked on a fishing expedition that has little to do with ascertaining any unknown facts about an event that took place live on television—leaving few, if any, unsolved mysteries for Congress to explore.

It's clear the committee exists to justify the hyperbolic claim that the riot was an "insurrection" or an attempted coup. What happened that day was clearly a chaotic and appalling mess, but not an orchestrated plot. But the committee is determined to find a conspiracy, even if it has to manufacture one. It has spent its time cobbling together a narrative from events and opinions that reveal nothing more than a common desire on the part of former president Donald Trump and some supporters to find a legal stratagem to deny the presidency to Joe Biden.


Open-ended investigations are always problematic. But this one has been made worse by the fact that it was formed to do the will of the majority with none of the customary limits imposed by the presence of members of the minority.

The selection of the committee's membership was unprecedented. Pelosi rejected the House Republican conference's choices for membership in the body. Instead she chose two anti-Trump Republicans—Reps. Liz Cheney (Wyo.) and Adam Kinzinger (Ill.), who were eager to assist the speaker in attacking not just the former president but also the party with which they are now only loosely associated.

There is, however, a precedent for how the committee has been proceeding: the hearings conducted by the House and the Senate in the late 1940s and early 1950s that are broadly lumped together under the term "McCarthyism."

The House Un-American Activities Committee and the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations chaired by Sen. Joseph McCarthy (R-Wisc.) were the primary engines of McCarthyism. Their probes into alleged communist subversion were not illegitimate in principle. Though their liberal critics often spoke as if there were no American communists, the Soviet Union's archives have since confirmed that party members were spying for Moscow and or had attempted to influence policy and culture at its behest.


But the McCarthyite probes were a parody of anti-communism. McCarthy's efforts often targeted people who were not actual communists, and allowed accusers to publicly shame and ostracize victims, ruining many lives.

More: https://www.newsweek.com/jan-6-committee-isnt-defending-democracy-its-mccarthyite-witch-hunt-opinion-1667488

quote:

Adam Kinzinger joins CNN days after leaving Congress, sparking viral mockery: 'Nobody saw this coming'

Critics long predicted Adam Kinzinger was aiming for a plum cable news gig following his term in office

https://www.foxnews.com/media/adam-kinzinger-joins-cnn-days-after-leaving-congress-sparking-viral-mockery

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
The selection of the committee's membership was unprecedented. Pelosi rejected the House Republican conference's choices for membership in the body. Instead she chose two anti-Trump Republicans—Reps. Liz Cheney (Wyo.) and Adam Kinzinger (Ill.), who were eager to assist the speaker in attacking not just the former president but also the party with which they are now only loosely associated.

More: https://www.newsweek.com/jan-6-committee-isnt-defending-democracy-its-mccarthyite-witch-hunt-opinion-1667488

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

Putting the rest of your lies and mindless spew aside for one moment - you're good with your queen naming every member of your witch hunt show trial
That's what you call "bipartisan"

Got it .

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01
lol... "Lies and mindless spew"????? Please identify a single thing I said, which is factually inaccurate.

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

Still not watching a video.

Use your words.

quote:

ORIGINAL: JVoV

I choose not to watch videos that I have no information about. I choose not to waste my time. You could add a sentence or two talking about the videos you post. Or their significance to you.

Remember, even if I am the only one posting, others see this forum too.