Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Jane Fonda


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Jane Fonda Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/19/2006 2:06:45 PM   
NastyDaddy


Posts: 957
Joined: 9/8/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JohnWarren

quote:

ORIGINAL: NastyDaddy

The bottom line of all this banter and pointed opinion is that Jane Fonda tried to do something to stop mutual useless carnages she felt very strongly about. While not defending Jane's methods, I stated that her motivation was indeed understandable.



Then, you would accept that while not necessarily defending the helicopter's crews methods, their motivation was indeed understandable?  Or can a person be called into account when their motivation is understandable, but the actions seem improper?


Good counterpoint, but the situations for each were in different realms. Jane Fonda was and is a noncombatant, does not wear the uniform of the US armed forces, and is not confined in her killing to the long established Geneva Convention.

While I can easily see the motivation vs. methodology in both cases (perhaps more on the chopper crew for things they see daily), I still cannot excuse the murders of innocents in the name of freedom... what about their freedom?

Other comments about RPG and SA7's being tossed in the grass... if this speculation is true, why would the RPG or SA7 only be of use once the farm tractor (which was running rows) arrived where the alleged weapon was 'thrown down', further, why would the second farmer go around the other side of the now stopped tractor to change or attach something to the damn tractor?? Is there a mount on the farm tractor for a weapon??? All that speculation aside, whether or not there were secondary explosions from an RPG or SA7 in the grass seems to also be of little significance.

The real kicker was the finishing off of the 3rd wounded farmer, that was noting more than a cowardly act of a long distance remote control killer, with a good video game score of: US - 50,000 bullets  Farmers: 0 bullets

(in reply to JohnWarren)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/19/2006 3:36:38 PM   
Pavel


Posts: 308
Joined: 1/10/2005
From: Washington
Status: offline
I've heard of truck bombs made out of firetrucks, donkey pulled rocket launchers, and all sorts of wacky stuff.  Not exactly on topic, but just because it looks kinda non-threatening, doesn't mean that it is.  Maybe the tractor was going to be the method of transport for the weapon  (as noone would dismount, and search a tractor moving in an agricultural area) and it broke down.  Perhaps he's signing some kinda paperwork to show that jihad cell of rightousness and all that junk recieved it's RPG, as requested, on time.  Regardless, the object looks really suspecious, and the activities of those on the ground certainly didn't look kosher.

I wouldn't expect to make out any kind of explosion amoung a salvo of 30 MM rounds unless it was somthing very large.  As is an anti-aircraft missle launcher, or a RPG round isn't going to stand out much.

As to the man wounded on the ground, here were the options available; fly off (which has the possiblity of him dying anyways in a longer more protracted time frame, or if his lil insurgent friends are around, they retrieve him, and return him to the fight) or shoot him, and end whatever threat he presented.  Aircraft, last time I checked do not have the ability, and from what I know are not required to make provisions for EPWs. 

(in reply to NastyDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/19/2006 4:00:49 PM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
I don't buy it. It's a little like justifying the London police killing that Brazilian guy because he came out of a house that was being watched for terrorists and headed for the underground station. Suspicion and his suspicious movements got his brains blown out. Yet, he was totally innocent!!! Suspicion tends to reinforce prejudices which is why killing someone based on their suspicious movements is unjustified especially when no one is in danger.

I'm with NastyDaddy. It's videokilling.

Maybe that SAM missile was a tractor halfshaft or driveshaft, whatever?

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 5/19/2006 4:04:48 PM >

(in reply to Pavel)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/19/2006 4:17:54 PM   
NastyDaddy


Posts: 957
Joined: 9/8/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pavel
As to the man wounded on the ground, here were the options available; fly off (which has the possiblity of him dying anyways in a longer more protracted time frame, or if his lil insurgent friends are around, they retrieve him, and return him to the fight) or shoot him, and end whatever threat he presented.  Aircraft, last time I checked do not have the ability, and from what I know are not required to make provisions for EPWs. 


oh... ok I think I got a clearer picture now... lemme see, the large farm truck was obviously a Mobile WMD Lab (MWMDL), a chemical laboratory to be more specific (MWMDCL)... while the smaller farm truck was a MWMDL of the most terriblest fucking  nature, a biological cesspool laboratory (MWMDBCL)... complete with test monkey driving it, while the tractor and it's special agent nuclear scientist driver Uncle Elmer both dreamt of driving full speed into/over/through an M1Abrahms tank... all them bastards on one spot at the same time.... talk about fortunate, wholly shit it doesn't get any better than this... Yeah I'm with ya them sumbitches thought they were smarter than the idiots with the guns, and that one insurgent fooker pulling that lame shit of not exploding... hehe!

... As far as appropriate punishment for that traitorous treasonist beotch tnuc Jane Fonda... perhaps she should have to work on a farm?

(in reply to Pavel)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/19/2006 4:35:11 PM   
NeedToUseYou


Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005
From: None of your business
Status: offline
The point about the video was there is odd behaviour. Whether they were farmers or not is up in the air. You can't say they were definitively, yet you are making ascertions as if that crappy video is proof. It isn't. When I watched, and rewatched it. There was more wrong with the activity than right. Could they have been farmers, well I guess. Could they have been terrorist, well I guess. Could they have been farmers and terrorists, well I guess. Could they have been farmers just trying to make a buck transporting arms for the terrorists. Well, I guess. You don't know, definitively, but apparently it appeals to you that they were farmers.
My overall judgement is that video is odd and not completely conclusive. But I'm sure the pilots have encountered such things and were privvy to better quality video than that crappily encoded version we are viewing. So, they might have saw something we didn't, been privvy to intel about the exchange. Or who knows what else. It's arrogant to assume, these guys are just going around getting hard blowing the fuck out of people. Maybe, they were, but that video in no way is evidence. Hell, we can't make out what he was carrying. We didn't here much of the conversation before they started firing. No one knows. So, it's crap for proof.

(in reply to NastyDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/19/2006 5:21:43 PM   
ScooterTrash


Posts: 1407
Joined: 1/24/2005
From: Indiana
Status: offline
I did go into the service as the VietNam war was drawing to a close. My recollections were not from personal accounts, but Fonda's escapades were well know throughout the general population on the inside. This how I know of what happened, of Fonda's actions and what she stood for. I didn't read it in a book, I didn't have to hear about it on the news (although I did), I certainly didn't have to check it out on the net, 40 some odd years later. I heard stories, or if you insist, hear-say since they weren't first hand, but the tales were abundent about her behavior and how she was very verbal about how American soldiers were heartless baby killers, murderous dopers and the like. No...War is not a popular activity but I went "in" to serve my country and would have done whatever was requested of me. Was I in favor of the war? Not exactly, I'll admit I would have preferred the war end and I did in fact wear a peace sign around my neck, but I was also very patriotic, still am for that matter and my personal gut feelings at the time certainly did not deter me from performing my duties to the best of my ability. I felt the cause was justified, as many of us did and just because we didn't stage pro-war demonstrations, it didn't necessarily mean we were all for it either. It was a tough time in U.S. history and the climate was active no matter what your feelings, but there is a line that should not be crossed. Think what you want to think, discuss what you want to discuss, but befriending the enemy is not something that should be done and is certainly one of those lines.
 
There is a substantial difference between being patriotic while perhaps still having somewhat opposing views about the politics of the war, than there is of obviously being sympathetic of the enemy and critical of those who are only doing what they felt was their duty to their country. Fonda a traitor? Well if she's not, she's damned close. It's fairly obvious she was not patriotic, quite far from it and the tainted place she made in the bowels of history by her actions, is well deserved.

_____________________________

Formal symbolic representation of qualitative entities is doomed to its rightful place of minor significance in a world where flowers and beautiful women abound.
-Albert Einstein

(in reply to windchymes)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/19/2006 5:46:06 PM   
MsMacComb


Posts: 808
Joined: 3/30/2005
From: My Mothers womb.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ScooterTrash

I did go into the service as the VietNam war was drawing to a close. My recollections were not from personal accounts, but Fonda's escapades were well know throughout the general population on the inside. This how I know of what happened, of Fonda's actions and what she stood for. I didn't read it in a book, I didn't have to hear about it on the news (although I did), I certainly didn't have to check it out on the net, 40 some odd years later. I heard stories, or if you insist, hear-say since they weren't first hand, but the tales were abundent about her behavior and how she was very verbal about how American soldiers were heartless baby killers, murderous dopers and the like. No...War is not a popular activity but I went "in" to serve my country and would have done whatever was requested of me. Was I in favor of the war? Not exactly, I'll admit I would have preferred the war end and I did in fact wear a peace sign around my neck, but I was also very patriotic, still am for that matter and my personal gut feelings at the time certainly did not deter me from performing my duties to the best of my ability. I felt the cause was justified, as many of us did and just because we didn't stage pro-war demonstrations, it didn't necessarily mean we were all for it either. It was a tough time in U.S. history and the climate was active no matter what your feelings, but there is a line that should not be crossed. Think what you want to think, discuss what you want to discuss, but befriending the enemy is not something that should be done and is certainly one of those lines.
 
There is a substantial difference between being patriotic while perhaps still having somewhat opposing views about the politics of the war, than there is of obviously being sympathetic of the enemy and critical of those who are only doing what they felt was their duty to their country. Fonda a traitor? Well if she's not, she's damned close. It's fairly obvious she was not patriotic, quite far from it and the tainted place she made in the bowels of history by her actions, is well deserved.
 

Scooter, in your honest opinion would the reaction have been the same if it was a man that did what she did? Or a person that had a different type of personality? Just curious if the real animosity is what she actually did or the fact that she was born rich, good looking and white with an easy life?

_____________________________

Not looking for anyone for anything, any time.

(in reply to ScooterTrash)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/19/2006 5:48:36 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
Fonda has a plethora of fans... so her tainted place in history is from your view and not from everyone's view. My former dom was in the National Guard during Vietnam, and he loves Fonda (he is almost 56 now).

He used to tell me how when Kent State happened, his command LAUGHED about "those hippies" they shot down like dogs (some of those students weren't even involved in any protests).

You know there is more than one side to what occurred during that era. No matter how we bash Fonda, or any other peacenik, the fact remains Vietnam was a HORRIBLE waste of human life, and POLITICIANS start wars, heroes die in them. All wars are for profiteers, countries do not engage in war for the common good of the common man. While politicians make war our children die in them. If they want to start a draft for this war or the war they want to start with Iran, I say OVER MY DEAD BODY DO OIL MEN GET MY SON TO DIE FOR THEIR PROFITS...period, end of story. I have a 16 year old son, and I am his mother before I am an American, plain and simple.

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to ScooterTrash)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/19/2006 5:59:47 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
I would certainly say World War II was one for "the common man". No oil (or "oil war" paranoia), no mountains of gold.....

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/19/2006 6:34:48 PM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
Without WWI which started from an arms race and the humiliation heaped on Germany by French occupation of Alsace amongst other things, WWII wouldn't have happened.

My great uncle fought in WWI and was gassed, we didn't know he was highly decorated or a real hero in the eyes of his comrades until his funeral when his comrades came from where they had emigrated to from all over the world, such was the high regard in which they held him. The only thing I can ever remember him saying about wars or anyone else can remember (he died when I was young) was that the common soldier has his gun pointing in the wrong direction. Its the bastards behind you that ought to be shot.

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/29/2006 8:55:12 AM   
NavyDDG54


Posts: 203
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMacComb

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
If criticizing your country for fighting a stupid war is treason, she was a traitor but others would say that is what a true patriot does.  
 

Indeed. BushCo has tried to convince everyone that questioning or dissent is either treason or aiding and abetting the enemy. Chency would accuse his own mother of being an insurgent if she didnt agree with him. The irony is that much of this mentality is exactly what our founding fathers fought against. Thank God they won. I know and used to live next to Jane. She was misguided in her approach and efforts but not her intent. She was young and we all make mistakes, more so in our youth. The difference is that most peoples mistakes are not played out in the national media.


Travelling to an enemy country while we are in a state of hostile conflict with them, allowing yourself to be used by the enemy as propoganda, criticizing our troops(while in the enemy country), is aiding and abetting the enemy. and she should have been apprehended immediatly upon her return to the states and convicted of treason.

(in reply to MsMacComb)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/29/2006 9:14:02 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
I wouldn't criticize ordinary soldiers of any country who are merely doing their duty by following orders. History has proved the Vietnam war was wrong and was obviously wrong at the time! It was a colonial war of engrandisement, it was the US politicians that sent US soldiers to Vietnam that were responsible for all the deaths in Vietnam, including most of the deaths of the Vietnamese and Fonda wasn't responsible for the deaths of anyone. She is a convenient scapegoat however.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 5/29/2006 9:15:25 AM >

(in reply to NavyDDG54)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/29/2006 9:23:36 AM   
Wolf1020


Posts: 447
Joined: 11/7/2005
From: Anderson, SC
Status: offline

I to this day will not pay money for anything Jane Fonda is a part of.  She was a traitor to this country and that is something inexcusable.  I also will never support someone like John Kerry who is even worse a traitor to this country.  He whined to get purple hearts for scratches and to be sent home early, and testified before the senate BS that our real men were being tortured to say for propaganda reasons.  He gave it to them for free on a silver platter.

No, I will never support that woman, and I will NEVER support that so called man.

_____________________________

"The less people know about how sausages and laws are made, the better they'll sleep at night."~ Otto von Bismarck

"Fish and visitors smell in three days"~Benjamin Franklin

(in reply to RavenMuse)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/29/2006 9:36:27 AM   
Morpheus07


Posts: 89
Joined: 4/29/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NavyDDG54

quote:

ORIGINAL: MsMacComb

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
If criticizing your country for fighting a stupid war is treason, she was a traitor but others would say that is what a true patriot does.  
 

Indeed. BushCo has tried to convince everyone that questioning or dissent is either treason or aiding and abetting the enemy. Chency would accuse his own mother of being an insurgent if she didnt agree with him. The irony is that much of this mentality is exactly what our founding fathers fought against. Thank God they won. I know and used to live next to Jane. She was misguided in her approach and efforts but not her intent. She was young and we all make mistakes, more so in our youth. The difference is that most peoples mistakes are not played out in the national media.




Travelling to an enemy country while we are in a state of hostile conflict with them, allowing yourself to be used by the enemy as propoganda, criticizing our troops(while in the enemy country), is aiding and abetting the enemy. and she should have been apprehended immediatly upon her return to the states and convicted of treason.



NavyDDG54, I agree completely and couldn't have said it better myself.

From what I have read from the "Jane Fonda of today", no one feels worse about what she did than her, thats all that needs to be said about the right or wrong of it, as far as I am concerned.

_____________________________

Its a case of mind over matter, "I don't mind, because you don't matter!"

(in reply to NavyDDG54)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/29/2006 9:46:29 AM   
Morpheus07


Posts: 89
Joined: 4/29/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

I wouldn't criticize ordinary soldiers of any country who are merely doing their duty by following orders. History has proved the Vietnam war was wrong and was obviously wrong at the time! It was a colonial war of engrandisement, it was the US politicians that sent US soldiers to Vietnam that were responsible for all the deaths in Vietnam, including most of the deaths of the Vietnamese and Fonda wasn't responsible for the deaths of anyone. She is a convenient scapegoat however.



May I ask where (what country) you are from? You, like me, have your profile turned off, so it's hard to know where you are coming from. But from reading many of your posts, it is obvious that you are far, far to the left in your political leanings, and your statement above shows your lack of understanding in regard to American history.

_____________________________

Its a case of mind over matter, "I don't mind, because you don't matter!"

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/29/2006 10:09:06 AM   
twistedsexbitch


Posts: 1
Joined: 3/2/2006
Status: offline
"I to this day will not pay money for anything Jane Fonda is a part of.  She was a traitor to this country and that is something inexcusable.  I also will never support someone like John Kerry who is even worse a traitor to this country.  He whined to get purple hearts for scratches and to be sent home early, and testified before the senate BS that our real men were being tortured to say for propaganda reasons.  He gave it to them for free on a silver platter.

No, I will never support that woman, and I will NEVER support that so called man."

                                              --------------------------

Kudos to Wolf1020 on his response.  Jane should have been supporting our troops instead of putting our country down.  Whether she was right or wrong, her total disregard for our soldiers and her disrespect for her own country were totally out of line.  Maybe she thought her comments would increase her popularity as a "star", but she only showed herself to be a traitor to her country.   What an embarrassment she must have been to her father.  And I know many servicemen of that era and other wars who also feel she was a traitor and refuse to pay money or to see anything that she's part of.  As for John Kerry, enough said.  He almost makes Jane look good.



(in reply to Morpheus07)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/29/2006 10:54:11 AM   
Wolf1020


Posts: 447
Joined: 11/7/2005
From: Anderson, SC
Status: offline
lol, almost is the key word.

If it is on tv I will watch it.  But I wont pay any extra out of pocket to go see it in a theater or to rent it.

_____________________________

"The less people know about how sausages and laws are made, the better they'll sleep at night."~ Otto von Bismarck

"Fish and visitors smell in three days"~Benjamin Franklin

(in reply to twistedsexbitch)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/29/2006 11:16:36 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Morpheus07


quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

I wouldn't criticize ordinary soldiers of any country who are merely doing their duty by following orders. History has proved the Vietnam war was wrong and was obviously wrong at the time! It was a colonial war of engrandisement, it was the US politicians that sent US soldiers to Vietnam that were responsible for all the deaths in Vietnam, including most of the deaths of the Vietnamese and Fonda wasn't responsible for the deaths of anyone. She is a convenient scapegoat however.



May I ask where (what country) you are from? You, like me, have your profile turned off, so it's hard to know where you are coming from. But from reading many of your posts, it is obvious that you are far, far to the left in your political leanings, and your statement above shows your lack of understanding in regard to American history.


I hold British & Dutch passports, my brother has an American passport ( I think he already has it) and it is an argument between us.

(in reply to Morpheus07)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/29/2006 2:48:25 PM   
Petronius


Posts: 289
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

I think of a propaganda effort by the ultra-right.

I've followed the technique as it's unfolded on sites like bondage.com and in broad discussion groups on the Internet.

It normally takes one of two forms.

First, the person was just sort of "wandering" around the net and "discovered" the thing they're posting. They tell you "it isn't their view" and they "don't know if it is true or not" but were "just wondering" if it was.

Now a rational honest person with such "wonderings" checks it out for him or herself. They don't post something on the Internet and ask others, "innocently."

Second, the person gets it in email with the same sort of "isn't my view" and "I don't know."

But the person acts the same way.

A while ago you could see this played out on bondage.com on a routine basis.

It was telling to see the rightwing "accidents" that the "innocent" poster ran into. Once it would be some "innocent" report that a group of Blacks accused of raping a white woman were let off because prosecuting them would be "racist." Then they'd sort of "accidentally" discover reports that John Kerry was a paid agent of the KGB. It "wasn't their view" of course but they badly needed to "know if it was true." Or they'd hear that some Democratic congressmen with a shirtful of medals had "faked" all of them and "has anybody heard."

Another telling point about the dishonest presentation of rightwing propaganda is that the original poster has a propensity to just disappear from the discussion that he or she started.

It seems that after finding an issue so important that they need to throw mud they lose interest in the mud immediately after they've thrown it.

I've looked over the discussion and couldn't find Windchymes in it. Did I miss her ongoing interest in the discussion she asked for.

Or, like rightwing propagandists elsewhere, did she suddenly split after posting the defamation that "wasn't her position."

Did she stick around to get her questions answered? Or did the posing of the "question" simply become the way to throw mud?




(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Jane Fonda - 5/30/2006 10:51:11 AM   
pinkee


Posts: 487
Status: offline
Jane Fonda is one of only a few people i have never whom i truely despise.  i cannot forgive her treachery during the Vietman War, adding to the suffering of our Men.
 
i also thought she was a crappy actress.  i guess now that she's married to Trump, she wants some respectability.  She'll never get it from me.
 
pinkee

< Message edited by pinkee -- 5/30/2006 10:52:23 AM >

(in reply to Petronius)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Jane Fonda Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.372