lally3
Posts: 595
Joined: 3/4/2008 Status: offline
|
, "You are who you pretend to be. So be very careful who you pretend to be." smile... you know what im going to say dont you... if youre being covert then yes, be very careful, particularly if it means a firing squad at dawn if youre not. being covert in order to get your jollies or cut your teeth on someone elses parade has an entirely different outcome. but again im not necessarily saying that certain people are being overly covert, i believe in alot of cases they honestly believe its for them, until they have a go. but having a go isnt on, if youre having a go with someone who is clearly giving their best, without conditions, not one of those subs who says, yes but only if, and no cos i dont want to submit myself to that. having a go, making promises, going 7 yards down the optional 9 and then pulling out because theyve decided that actually its all a little bit too much effort after all - stinks. You mentioned the emotional excitement s-types experience. D-types get it too. And especially for males, after 40 years of feminism, imagine discovering "D/s" - "I am Dom, hear me roar! I get what I want when I want it!" Problem is, it's that old dog chasing the car thing again - what do you do with it when you get it. You actually have to have an idea of what the dynamic needs to be, and both people need to have signed off on that idea. absolutely - the premis of D/s is a symbiosis that is a) hard to find and b) hard to keep. half the battle therefore is knowing from the outset that what you have found is rare and worth working at. if a person hasnt yet discovered how difficult it is to find someone who clicks chemically, physically, mentally, psychologically, sexually, kinkally and if they havent yet learnt that that doesnt come along every day then, in my view, they havent yet caught on to the premis of D/s or worse, they never actually meant to. what to do with it when youve got it is absolutely true - i really think that is often the stumbling block - its also chase over - and eek, horror of horrors - no excuses left to do a bunk - so maybe much easier not to look for that submission in your sub, much easier to have your fun and move on before it all gets committed and messy. no, im not bitter, really, im smiling as i write this - irony amuses me. I call it "ethical commonality" because it covers a lot more. It obviates negotiation, because you're all at the same place ethically. You don't have to tell him "no chainsaws" because he's not a chainsaw kinda guy. But it also means you're both seeking the same emotional dynamic. And it needn't be love. It can be compatibity or consistency of attention or a certain sadomasochistic interaction - or simply sex. The point is, the people involved have done the work before commitment to know they're both (or all) after the same thing. yes - i live in hope.. smile)) Someone earlier made the comment that offering the collar is similar to "Yeah, baby, I love you" - a shortcut to orgasm. It's a shame that in this day and age, decades after the Summer of Love and sexual exploration and Free Love and available birth control and condoms, we still feel the need to barter underhandedly for sex, to offer something we don't really intend to give for a quick blow job or horizontal mambo. you see, i think everyone knows that is what this is about - infact, its part of why the whole sexual thing leaps out far too quickly sometimes. the whole topic is sexually charged and its quite difficult to keep it from being anything else sometimes. particularly if vanilla isnt an option and you havent had any for months.. lol. I have nothing against anonymous, spontaneous sport f**king. I have nothing against sex for the hell of it. But if someone wants to serve me, they'd damned better want to *serve me*. Because I'm going to put a lot of time and effort into the dynamic. But before that happens, we're all gonna be spending a helluva lot of time making sure we're all on the same page. and the opposite applied in context here - subs who have submitted - if someone wants to master me, theyd damned better want to *master me*. because im going to put a lot of time and effort into the dynamic. but from now on im going to spend so much fucking time getting to know them and make sure we are on the same page. Am I "in it for whatever I get out of it?" Absolutely! I'm a selfish SOB. And I expect anyone in service to me to be in it for whatever *they* get out of it. 'Cuz if they ain't getting anything out of it, ain't gonna work, is it? i dont think thats being selfish, i think thats how it is - as an M you dont want to be pouring yourself into someone who isnt enjoying themselves and vice versa But hit 'em and hit the road? That's teenage crap. isnt it, and wouldnt you think that guys after a certain age should know better, it was my hope anyway. but ive learnt alot about myself and all of this through talking this out through this thread and the 'detached' thread. its made me realise that i have taken too much on trust and not enough on hard evidence. so a real learning curve for me. thanks. D., realizing he's talking way too much this morning... "I've always basically been a life support system for a mouth." - Col. Jack Jacobs (Ret.) [/quote]
_____________________________
even doves have pride (Prince)
|