agirl
Posts: 4530
Joined: 6/14/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NuevaVida Yelling can be abusive, in certain contexts, as can breaking things, as can hitting, as can lodging threats. It depends on context and it depends on what the observers to that behavior can handle. And just because someone can't handle something you think they should, does not mean they are less of a person, or less worthy, or "too weak." We all have different thresholds. We all are affected differently by different things. Things that might upset you, for example, might roll off my shoulder as no big deal. But where the hell is my compassion and expanded thinking if I point and say you are wrong for feeling as you do? That is, essentially, what you are doing to those of us who are finding potentials for abuse in the things you are not. Personally, if the person I'm with yells and breaks things over financial issues, or clumsiness issues, or any other issue for that matter, I'm going to feel scared in that environment, and I'm going to lose respect, thinking this person doesn't handle anger and frustration very well. I'll probably refer him to some really good books on the subject, and find him to be overall a rather unhappy person. My former owner yelled a lot about things I found unnecessary. I always told him it made me feel frightened when he did, and that I was concerned for his peace of mind, as it didn't seem to exist. When he would get that way I would shut down, become extremely quiet, and it would take some work on his part to make me feel safe enough to come out from my emotional barriers. I wasn't afraid he would physically assault me; I was feeling emotionally and spiritually assualted in that environment, whether it had to do with me or not. The difference between what he did and what I am seeing in these threads is that he recognized it as abuse and chose to continue anyway, rather than to say I was wrong for feeling assaulted. Instead, it was our understanding that he could behave abusively with me if he wanted to, and, at times, he did. He never hid the fact of what he was doing. He acknowledged it and said it would continue. I accepted it as part of the bigger picture that was our relationship. If he put me down for feeling what I did, I may have responded differently. There is a line in my favorite piece of writing (Desiderata, by Max Ehrmann): "Avoid loud and aggressive persons; they are vexatious to the spirit." You have been asking (in the other thread) for all sorts of clinical papers that define abuse and its progression. Why? I did a Google search and found all sorts of things that support what years of counseling have already taught me - assault to the body/mind/heart/spirit is abuse. To stand hard in defense of that, demonstrates, in my opinion, an unwillingness to look beyond one's own behavior and persona and the effects it may have on others. It is to stand in place with little regard for others. And while I know that sometimes people throw the "abuse" word around as an excuse for not looking at their own person and possible issues with the ability to reason, I haven't seen that addressed here - I have seen people genuinely speak of their own histories with abuse, and those stories brushed aside for lack of "clinical evidence." Is is not enough that someone might feel emotionally unsafe? Should that be reason enough for someone to want to evaluate his/her own behavior in the situation? Or is is more important to stand firm that "My behavior is ok and the rest of you are wrong." ?? Isn't that an indication that you're with someone that isn't *good for you'?..It might take a goodly while to realise these things but people cleave to one another for all sorts of reasons. Why's he being a pig......Why am I accepting him being a pig? Inside a relationship, especially one that's fairly longheld, there's a lot to untangle and consider before the * I'm off* clause. It's rarely EVER cut and dried. It's not enough in my book, for ME to feel unhappy or emotionally 'unsafe' , to call a guy an abuser, no. agirl
|