Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: -=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, Shame on You=-


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: -=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, Shame on You=- Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: -=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, S... - 1/4/2009 11:54:18 AM   
pixidustpet


Posts: 857
Joined: 6/4/2008
Status: offline
~~fast reply~~

labels...to me, they're a good jumping off point.  i talk to someone in this community, they ask me my orientation, i say "bi, sub" and they have a generalized notation of where i stand.  they ask further, and i can say "i am attracted to specific females, find women in general attractive and soft to snuggle with, i prefer bottoming but i'm unable to do X activities for Y reason, and Z activities make me hot".

its like the chicken soup analogy that LadyP put out there.  just because i fall under the general label of "submissive" doesnt mean i submit to just anyone, nor does it mean that i might not be slave to some specific dominant.  at the same time submitting doesnt mean i put my brain on the shelf and become mindlessly obedient, i have will and spunk and several other witty words and i *am* likely to speak my opinion (respectfully, mind you!) if it is an appropriate time to do so.

i know someone who identifies as dominant isnt going to be bowing to my wishes.  i know that a fellow submissive and i would be looking at each other "um, who swings the flogger?"   

labels are good in that they give you some generalized information about a person/place/thing.  they arent the be-all and end-all of that person, though.

kitten, labeling her glass as "empty" and going to find more liquid with which to fill it

(in reply to AngelGeena)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: -=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, S... - 1/4/2009 11:57:01 AM   
T1981


Posts: 557
Joined: 12/6/2008
Status: offline
Pixiedust, that was a really great post! I couldn't have said it better! (and I love the bit about the subs and flogger - lol!)

_____________________________

"Nothing is pointless, every single thing you do resonates." -Pintsize

(in reply to pixidustpet)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: -=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, S... - 1/4/2009 1:57:07 PM   
scottjk


Posts: 335
Joined: 4/18/2005
Status: offline
Here's my two cents on this so far...

To start, 'labels' are only limiting because you believe they are. You did it to yourself, no one did it to you.

If you would like to have a relationship building discussion with me, guess what? You'll have to whisper one of those dratted labels into my ear to get me to respond appropriately. I respond differently to submissives than I do to dominants. That difference is highly contrasted by my humor and character. If I'm aware of your basic label, I'll be better able to navigate our conversation to our mutual satisfaction. I don't think I'm alone in this idea.

RS made a very good post, but I suspect that he's joined me at the head banging wall and making a nifty bloody spot right next to mine. I understand how 'dangerous' some of you feel about labels, but I feel that they are not nearly as dangerous as you might think. As a community, we MUST agree on what the basic, (BASIC) relationships there are so that we can all communicate effectively, for the sake of the veterans as well as the newcomers and for those in between. If we don't do this, we run the risk of not being worth a damn to anyone when it's our turn to communicate ideas, theories and facts. That is what RS pointed out. (And what I've been saying for years!)

Now as far as these forums are concerned, I don't care very much if you're sub, dom, top, bottom, (ad nauseum), blue, purple or even a daisy. You're a human being (as far as these things go). If you choose to use a label, then my perspective will change appropriately. If you do not, then the context of our conversations will change slowly based on what we talk about and especially what you say. I may decide that you're predominantly sub,  or switch, or dom. It's not an act of spite, disrespect or malice. It just means that YOU led me to that conclusion which in turn established that perspective I have towards you.

Excuse me, I need to spend more time with RS at the wall, my bloody spot has dried out.



_____________________________

Thou art fertile ground and I will plant a garden in thee.

(in reply to T1981)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: -=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, S... - 1/4/2009 1:57:17 PM   
ResidentSadist


Posts: 12580
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: a mean old Daddy, but I like you - Joni Mitchell
Status: offline
So many eloquent and comprehensive replies.  I can’t keep up and thank everyone for expanding the point of the OP with their clean thinking and clear examples.  I got a bit of email and someone put it rather concisely saying, “I was rather fond of your thread...the entire purpose of "labels" is to be able to effectively communicate. If everything is variable to our whimsy, then we effectively lose the ability to interact.”

Now to catch up with the replies. 
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
……..Suppose you have decided that you are going to go to the store to buy yourself some chicken soup.  …..  Imagine how difficult it would be to make your purchase if when you got to the store, none of the cans had a label on them.  ….. Without a label, there would be no way of knowing a can of chicken soup when compared with a can of baked beans……

I feel the same way and recently used that very analogy. 

”Labels (stereotypes) are a good thing and like labels on the cans of food in my cupboard, they help prevent me from biting into the wrong thing.  I love labels, they help me communicate.  In a social setting it lets me know what type of people and protocols to use.”
-From: link

quote:

ORIGINAL: T1981
……..I think people often get tired of seeing the same questions/posts/pleas/etc etc over and over and over again. Perfectly understandable. …..But just because we know doesn't mean they do, and that's what we try to remember. Hell, for all we know, that poster's question could be the first time they've ever been on the internet, let alone asking a question about the specific subject….

Like many, I also fall victim and get lazy in my replies to recycled FAQ questions.  Almost everything in my “wall of text” OP are tidbits from things I have said in other threads.  I never put it all together in one large post before.  I wish we could have perfect etiquette and always treat our newcomers with the respect and consideration your perspective shows. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: laura2161
…….The problem I see is when someone takes their own meaning to a word and tries to shove it down soemone else's throat…. We can not change other's views on what they think slave and sub mean. It doesnt matter what the dictionary says, people still have their own definitions so when someone comes along and asks what's the difference, I can understand why some tell them not to worry about labels....and round and round it goes.

…and round and round and round it goes.  I wish the Mods here would post an FAQ sticky with links to the better threads that address the common recycled topics.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Timoty
……..If I ask and […] you are a submissive. That should symbolize to me a very definite starting point of who you are, and, who you are not. What a great place to start a discussion about the intricacies of life and relationships.

I am symbolized by many things …. etc. I am all these things and more but they do not define me, they are definitions of words used to foster communication and share our understandings. I know the worth (or. worthlessness) of the symbol and they don't bother me. Instead, I take it as a starting point to tell you who I am.

Yes, labels/stereotypes are a foundation, a starting point for communication and understanding.  No matter how you look at our BDSM relationship role labels and their definitions, whether or not that definition is as complete and complex as you are, often one of the most important things it may tell us is who or what you are not.  Like your red vs blue example demonstrates how important understanding the words we use is.    
quote:

ORIGINAL: Catgirl711
If I ask a student if they would prefer to do a Salsa or a Mambo, my student becomes confused.  …  They very similar. So similar in fact, that without the knowledge of what makes them different, how can my student choose…….In social dancing (ONLY) there are differing opinions on what makes the dance the dance.  My student will eventually learn their own interpretation of the dance, but I want to give them a starting point in which to interpret from.

Good point!  Nuances are subtle and styles can mingle in dance or relationship styles and roles but, you have to have a basic understanding first and in the end, Salsa is not a Mambo anymore than the color red is blue.    

quote:

ORIGINAL: IronBear
All words are labels, every blessed one of them. … . If we didn't use them we'd all be pointing at some one or something and grunting which wouldn't translate well into cyber space. …. 

LMAO… I love the primal example and think the grunting is supposed to come with play or sex after communication is established.   Labels and the communication it affords is a good thing indeed!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
[edit to add, I couldn’t find scottjk at the wall, it was too crowded!]
quote:

ORIGINAL: scottjk
… 'labels' are only limiting because you believe they are. You did it to yourself, no one did it to you. ….  If you would like to have a relationship building discussion with me, guess what? You'll have to whisper one of those dratted labels into my ear to get me to respond appropriately….

Good point.  There is a vast difference between someone that says they don’t know who they are yet and someone that rejects definition, labels or thinks they are restrictive instead of a definitive foundation or starting point for communication as explained by so many replies.  Especially someone that claims to defy the sum total of mankind’s collective self introspection and the labels or definitions created. 

I would describe myself as a gentleman sadist that prefers the Master’s role in a poly TPE.  Life is simple now but as a teen I was bisexual switch exploring all of the alternative lifestyles, swingers, hippies, BDSM, pansexual etc.  All these labels served to describe me accurately.  I do not see exploration as conflict or oversight as a flaw.  I just feel when exploring, you cannot observe everything at once.  I do not feel inadequate saying “I do not know yet”.   

You don’t have to be a sub or a slave in the BDSM lifestyle to “fit in”.  You can even just be kinky and enjoy slave/sub or other role play.  I always thought being a “kinky switch” while discovering who you were was a fine label.  Labels work and there is a way to communicate who you are using words we understand.

< Message edited by ResidentSadist -- 1/4/2009 2:22:48 PM >


_____________________________

-=BDSM Book List=- Reading is Fundamental !!!
I give good thread.


(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: -=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, S... - 1/4/2009 2:05:46 PM   
MadRabbit


Posts: 3460
Joined: 8/9/2006
Status: offline
I don't really see that at all, RS.

If you look in my signature, there is a link to a thread a month or so ago where the majority of the regular posters were able to contribute their own definitions to be juxtaposed with the others.

By looking at them all, we can see that there is, in fact, broad definitions to the words that most of use. The problem is when people attempt to take the words and apply even narrower definitions to them.

It's like the word "cook". I can say this word and most people will be able to immediately understand that I am someone who cooks food. Of course, this broad definition doesn't communicate all the details of what kind of cook I am. It doesn't say where I cook at, what kind of food I cook, whether I am payed money to cook or cook as a hobby, or have a degree in cooking from an accredited culinary school. To communicate that, I have to include other words to narrow down the definition such as "I am an Italian cook in Philadelphia who works at an Italian restaurant and has a degree from Johnson and Wales."

Much in the same way is the word "slave". When we use the word on these boards, the vast majority of us are able to understand that the person is involved in some kind of higher or more extreme form of power exchange or authority transfer. Just like the word "cook", however, it doesn't communicate the specifics of the dynamic or what all is entailed in that authority transfer. To communicate that, people have to simply go the extra step to add additional words that communicate the specifics of their dynamic like "TPE" or "service oriented".

Now imagine what would happen if we narrowed the definition of cook down to "a person who cooks Italian food in Phillida at an Italian restaurant with a degree from Johnson Wales". Would communication be improved or hindered? I would say that is definitely hindered because the narrow definition doesn't include the Mexican and Oriental cooks with a degree from the CIA who work in Los Angeles and San Fransisco.

From where I sit, I see it being the same way with the word "slave". Unless we are going to simply ignore the fact that in this vast and varied community there exists different philosophies, theories, and lifestyles regarding the M/S relationship, then attempting to make an explicit definition of the word slave according to one or the other simply hinders communication because it blacks out whole groups of people.

Maybe the limitation of self expression and the setting of an universal standard for "slave" that all of us must conform to in our own relationships to righteously call ourselves "Masters" and "slaves" (regardless of whether it makes us personally happy or expresses who we as individuals decide we are in this world) is what you are going for, but I see the results of such an attempt to be nothing but negative.

Personally, I could really care less. I have yet to figure out whether what I want out of a partner is properly classified, labeled, and stored properly in the right box of "submissive" or "slave" and I am not all that interested in figuring it out. I know what I want, what my relationship will entail, and I highly doubt the formation of an explicit definition of one word is going to really save me much time in the vast amount of details I will have to communicate to a potential partner to ensure we are a good match.



_____________________________

Advice for New Dominants
The Unpolitically Correct Lifestyle Definitions

Obama is NOT the Messiah! He's just a VERY NAUGHTY BOY

(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: -=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, S... - 1/4/2009 2:08:06 PM   
FullfigRIMAAM1


Posts: 1160
Joined: 11/20/2008
Status: offline
I loved this rant, and I love the labels, because I like my facts with minimal fluff, and maximum capacity to be understood by the masses.
Yes, I understand that philosophically speaking, a fish can be described, but meaningless without there actually being an experience with one, and even experience is subjective; but generally, I try to keep it simple and concrete when possible.
I LOVE LABELS, and will only avoid them if I know a particular label annoys a particular person (just as I don't like to be called honey by strangers...). M

_____________________________

The place to improve the world is first in one's own heart and head and hands.-Robert M. Persig

Love is the only sane and satisfactory answer to the problem of human existence Erich Fromm

(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: -=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, S... - 1/4/2009 4:36:37 PM   
Catgirl711


Posts: 41
Joined: 11/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MadRabbit

I don't really see that at all, RS.
.................
It's like the word "cook". I can say this word and most people will be able to immediately understand that I am someone who cooks food. Of course, this broad definition doesn't communicate all the details of what kind of cook I am. It doesn't say where I cook at, what kind of food I cook, whether I am payed money to cook or cook as a hobby, or have a degree in cooking from an accredited culinary school. To communicate that, I have to include other words to narrow down the definition such as "I am an Italian cook in Philadelphia who works at an Italian restaurant and has a degree from Johnson and Wales."

Much in the same way is the word "slave". When we use the word on these boards, the vast majority of us are able to understand that the person is involved in some kind of higher or more extreme form of power exchange or authority transfer. Just like the word "cook", however, it doesn't communicate the specifics of the dynamic or what all is entailed in that authority transfer. To communicate that, people have to simply go the extra step to add additional words that communicate the specifics of their dynamic like "TPE" or "service oriented".



Unless I've misunderstood, I'm lead to believe that you disagree.  However the rest of  the quoted post seems to be in agreement with the OP in that labels are used for basic communication.
While using the label of "cook" doesn't define you, it does give people a starting point in which to understand you.  Perhaps you don't want to tell certain folks just what kind of cook you are, but this at least let's them know that you don't paint houses or trade stocks. 

For me, the term "slave" defines me exactly. I may not fit someone else's description of the word but this at least let's someone know from the beginning that I like the role that has less authority in a relationship.  Now there is so much more to me, but in using this label someone who is looking for a Dom (or whatever) can know to move on.

Giving someone basic information and the tools for research is the best way to teach a newcomer (of anything) to think independently and develop their own sense style.



(in reply to MadRabbit)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: -=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, S... - 1/4/2009 5:34:49 PM   
gypsygrl


Posts: 1471
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: new york state
Status: offline
After the end of my last relationship I put something in my profile about how I feel about all of this.  Basically, I had done a lot of stupid things trying to prove (to who? I'm not sure.  Probably myself) that I was a slave.  That got waaaaayyyy dangerous.  As far as I'm concerned, the debate hasn't been resolved, and I remain a floor sitter.  :)

_____________________________

“To be happy is to be able to become aware of oneself without fright.” ~Walter Benjamin


(in reply to ResidentSadist)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: -=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, S... - 1/5/2009 7:11:43 AM   
AquaticSub


Posts: 14867
Joined: 12/27/2005
Status: offline
~Fast Reply~

Labels are useful - I've never felt otherwise. However, as we've talked about before, labels are useful to convey information in a setting where they are commonly understood. You believe in doing things by the dictionary but that would make your labels useless - and, in fact, a hinderence - in a tech setting where "master" and "slave" refer to computer settings and "male" and "female" refer to types of plugs.

Words mean different things in different situations. I use the label that, to most people in most situations, communicates effectively what I am yet those who are interested in a relationship with me need to ask me what those terms me to me and mine.

_____________________________

Without my dominance you cannot submit. Without your submission I cannot dominate. You are my equal in this, though our roles are different.-Val

It was ok for him to beat me but then he tried to cuddle me! - Me

Member:Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair

(in reply to beargonewild)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: -=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, S... - 1/5/2009 2:59:53 PM   
pixidustpet


Posts: 857
Joined: 6/4/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: T1981

Pixiedust, that was a really great post! I couldn't have said it better! (and I love the bit about the subs and flogger - lol!)


thank you!  *blushes* 

kitten

(in reply to T1981)
Profile   Post #: 50
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: -=Sub/Slave, Guppy/Shark, Role Mislabeling Fatal, Shame on You=- Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078