FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: stella41b quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY I think they portrayed it as a serious, unappreciated issue, and are pointing out Christians need to be considering all the lost souls out there. Well maybe these Christians could make a start with the 'lost souls' within their own brethren. As for the 'lost souls out there', some of us aren't lost souls at all, we just believe something different. And that's fine. Certainly there are more than simply Muslims to be concerned about. "Lost soul" in the Christian religious context, stella. quote:
ORIGINAL: stella41b quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY The video was aimed at Evangelical Christians, who are pretty much the only Christians with active missionary programs. I don't think it was aimed at the atheistic, liberal population, so it's appeal is specific, not general. Within that context, it's a call to action (as it stated) for a greater effort to spread the beliefs of Christianity. So non-Evangelicals are the 'atheistic, liberal population'? Generalisation perhaps? No, your separation is a false dichotomy. Human secularist would perhaps be a more acceptable term? Buddhist aren't "atheistic, liberal", neither are Wiccan, Muslim, or any other religious adherent. quote:
ORIGINAL: stella41b quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY To a liberal, mired in the multicultural belief that Western culture is inherently bad and evil, and call to defend the Western beliefs, cultures and way of life is seen as "xenophobic" and "hate mongering". Another generalisation, perhaps? Nope. Not at all. I make a distinction between "multiculturalism" and "toleration". quote:
ORIGINAL: stella41b quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY As far as the facts and statistics, I'm pretty familiar with the basic demographic issues related to the increase Islamic populations of Europe, and they aren't far wrong, although whether or not it's a "bad" as presented is open to discussion. A couple of things could happen to change the equation, and birth-rates, but they are pretty close for straight-line projections of current birth statistics. So what about immigration issues from and within Eastern Europe caused by the downfall of communism, the creation of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the accession to the European Union? I think it's pretty clear that they are talking primarily about Western Europe. quote:
ORIGINAL: stella41b quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY I'm not here actually "defending" the video as much as I am challenging the assumptions of many who skimmed the video, or who only bothered to listen for their "buzz words" which set off their "attack-o meters". I've watched the video a couple of times which might have made a much more convincing argument had it looked at all sides of the issue, but it didn't but tried to present an argument on the basis of its incomplete research. The assertion that 'Europe will cease to exist' without looking at Eastern Europe was pretty ridiculous, given that Russia and the Ukraine are sizeable countries in that part of Europe where the Orthodox Church is still quite strong. It also didn't mention Latin America, China or other parts of the world. I don't have facts and figures to offer, but I didn't find enough in the video to make any sort of convincing argument other than propaganda. See my previous comment. Firm
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|