Eigenaar
Posts: 352
Joined: 5/3/2008
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: krosiema
quote:
ORIGINAL: Eigenaar
I would like to remind you of our correspondence only a few days ago in which you were very open and revealed events from your past most people would not entrust a complete stranger with. You all of a sudden stopped responding without a word and now you attack me and accuse me of left-field logic and lacking facility with the English language and not grasping the nuances whereas the English language is partly based upon Dutch as a result of the Dutch occupying what is now the UK several times and without mentioning your ''friend'' being derogatory without reason. I can assure you I get most if not more nuances the average native English speaker gets and that the discussed style of English is not always colloqial. Are you saying I am a genius not having had to look at NihilusZero his profile to get he is not a native English speaker? Please explain ''left-field logic'' in regard to my postings as well as your sudden attack and the assumption I do not crasp the nuances of the English language I spoke before you were born and don't forget were this desire to lynch is based upon.
1.) This is exactly what I mean by a personal attack. Yes, I'm very open, because that's the kind of person I am. Sorry, but you're not special. And yes, I stopped answering your mail. Because you became way too pushy and interrogating, instead of having a two way conversation where you share a bit of yourself and I share a bit of myself. I have lots of mail to answer, if I commit myself to answering every single one of them, so I pick and choose the ones I find most interesting and comfortable with answering.
2.) There is something called 'dry sarcasm.' The fact that you are way too sensitive to it speaks for itself.
3.) I don't know which "friend" you are talking about. Honestly.
4.) One example of left-field logic: That because English is based on Dutch and you speak Dutch that you probably get more English nuances than most native speakers. Um, sorry, but no, that logic does not hold. English is also based on Latin. Does that mean a Latin speaker (from the past) who learned English (after being teleported to the present) would speak English better than native English speakers? Furthermore, your last sentence there didn't make any sense at all, after I read through it three times. (I'm not even going to point out the misspellings, since I'm sure I have some of my own in this post.)
Look just accept that you have deep-seated insecurities or that you just like trolling. It's okay; I troll forum boards, too. (Though, not CM, since many people here are too sensitive for my would-be troll-posts.)
Chillax and peace out, kk? :)
How come none of you remember having said certain things and are to lazy to scroll and read your own words? What do you mean by saying you are open and that I am not special? What does the ''special'' refer to? Were was I pushy? Why do you say sorry? Why do you mention dry sarcasm and where does it show I am sensitive to dry sarcasm? What makes you claim I do not get more English nuances than the average native speaker? Are you really saying I am transported/teleported from the past and that you did not get the lynching remark? You are pathetic. Where are all my misspelllings you mention and why would you mention them, where do I say I am immaculate? What is happening here? Am I considered a terrorist now?
< Message edited by Eigenaar -- 9/15/2009 5:07:21 PM >
|
RE: Would you take on a bi Master/Dom? - 
Profile
and hopefully 'ants in his pants' has retired! 
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread