DemonKia
Posts: 5521
Joined: 10/13/2007 From: Chico, Nor-Cali Status: offline
|
Okay. lol, after bemused read thru Sublace, I count on the other person to tell me what they are. I try to avoid going around & deciding other people's sexual orientation on my own . . . . . Sunnyfey, I think the effeminate thing is a result of what I think of as 'inappropriate correlation thinking' . . . . Humans tend to conflate 'strong correlatives' & 'weak correlatives' . . . . . Much of what we're talking about in these two threads is stuff that does have some weak correlation -- effeminancy can be weakly correlated to bisexuality which can be weakly correlated to polyamory & so on & so forth. But. For many people, these things are perceived as strong correlations. Everyone, a primer: Bisexuality & poly-vs-monogamous are separate, distinct, & independent orientations. I'll bet ya hard cash that there are plenty of monogamous bisexuals out there, just like there's plenty of poly straight people . . . . . Bisexuals are no more or less sexual than the heteros. Nor do they 'need' both a man & a woman, anymore than a hetero 'needs' someone of the opposite sex. Mostly, being bi means that the person is capable of being attracted to both sexes . . . .. Eigenar: Your debate style lacks substance & content & is unimpressive, so zip interest here in impressing you, please note. Plus, given the parameters outlined in your profile, yeah, you know all about discriminating sexual tastes, dontcha? I think that I see you lashing out at as a reflection of frustration with your own sexually discrimantory tastes & how that's worked out for you here on CM. Some advice. You need to get positive, & give up the negativity. Focus on what makes you happy rather than what angers you. You grow what you put your energy into.
|