Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/13/2010 8:55:31 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline

All this is good advice for dating. But we're not dating here are we? This is a hunt and you are the prey.

Hmmm...do all Dom's have the hunter instinct? Not all do for sure; some are knowledgeable and skilled men who enjoy doing temporary BDSM scenes. Nothing wrong with that. Then again, some are hunters who are a great scene and there's nothing wrong with that.

So, is it natural for the latter to treat you as prey? Yes.

And, since we're on the subject and I'll bring this home now, is it natural for a true submissive to get into a Dom/hunter's car and go where he leads and desire to be his prey?

You know the answer to that already. You broke his spell because he was clumsy and not as good as he thought. That's not the problem. The problem is finding a hunter you don't want to flee from...you know I'm right. You submissive women out there reading this know it's true. You hunters out there know it's true.

I know it's true. I'm a hunter.

Be well,
Arturas

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/13/2010 10:39:20 PM   
BurntKitty


Posts: 3340
Joined: 9/7/2010
From: Here To Eternity.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


All this is good advice for dating. But we're not dating here are we? This is a hunt and you are the prey.

Hmmm...do all Dom's have the hunter instinct? Not all do for sure; some are knowledgeable and skilled men who enjoy doing temporary BDSM scenes. Nothing wrong with that. Then again, some are hunters who are a great scene and there's nothing wrong with that.

So, is it natural for the latter to treat you as prey? Yes.

And, since we're on the subject and I'll bring this home now, is it natural for a true submissive to get into a Dom/hunter's car and go where he leads and desire to be his prey?

You know the answer to that already. You broke his spell because he was clumsy and not as good as he thought. That's not the problem. The problem is finding a hunter you don't want to flee from...you know I'm right. You submissive women out there reading this know it's true. You hunters out there know it's true.

I know it's true. I'm a hunter.

Be well,
Arturas


Maybe you're not dating, but I know I am.  When meeting someone, I do prefer the munches.  This way if there's a connection, we can play at the local dungeon, not alone.  If I'm meeting in a restaurant for a lunch with just him- I tell him straight out, I'm looking for a long term relationship, not casual sex.  I won't play outside of the dungeon for the reasons the OP mentioned.  I've weeded out a lot of unsavory people.

And don't get me started on "tw00 submissives" and dominant people as hunters....  I think I got dizzy from all my <eye rolls>



_____________________________

Cat Quotes

Count Boogie's Foot Fetish Anti Creepy Training video


(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/13/2010 10:57:24 PM   
catize


Posts: 3020
Joined: 3/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

..you know I'm right. You submissive women out there reading this know it's true. You hunters out there know it's true.


When we fail to see prospective partners as human, we lose our humanity. A date is a date, whether we are kinky or not. To think giving yourself the title of 'dominant' negates the rights of another because they have labeled themselves submissive is as wrong as rape .
Submissive equals prey/victim??? Not the way I see it, not in my world.

_____________________________

"Power is real. But it's a lot less real if it's not perceived as power."
Robert Parker, Stranger in Paradise

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 12:03:46 AM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: catize

quote:

..you know I'm right. You submissive women out there reading this know it's true. You hunters out there know it's true.


When we fail to see prospective partners as human, we lose our humanity. A date is a date, whether we are kinky or not. To think giving yourself the title of 'dominant' negates the rights of another because they have labeled themselves submissive is as wrong as rape .
Submissive equals prey/victim??? Not the way I see it, not in my world.



Greetings,

The reality is a Dom/sub date is not the same date in a vanilla relationship in the making . Trust me or not.

It's because we are not dating here in the traditional sense. Safe and sane? The reality is it is a great slogan and we do pay lip service to that and even talk about safe words but I've never run into a submissive that I could trust to utter a safe word (unless G_ddamn is a safe word) and many or even most are quite capable of following the lead of a Dom they may have just met. After all, being submissve in the BDSM or Gorean world does not mean you are not aggressive or adventuresome in following your desires. It is in their nature. So, the OP is not unusual in what she did when she got into his car and followed where he led on the first date. All submissives I have met real time followed where I led on the first date. I am not unique in that experience.

Another reality is the prey dynamic does figure quite strong in dating here and to a more "under the covers" extent in munches and a much bigger than life extent in most Lifestyle Clubs and dungeons (I said "dungeons", think about it).

Reality is also that "the prey", the female submissive, is not less human or of low quality or treated as "less human" for following their primal desires and instincts. Quite the opposite. In fact, I submit to you that they are more human than most in doing so.

Finally, I suggest these realities are known by most submissves who actually meet and date Doms from here and FL or in LIfestyle clubs accross this big world. They know the prey dynamic is very much there from minute one even if only subconsciously. It is why they are here and not on Match.com. It is what they want. It's what we want.

Respectfully,

Arturas



< Message edited by Arturas -- 11/14/2010 12:16:15 AM >

(in reply to catize)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 12:20:37 AM   
Focus50


Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lairaimmortelle

I've had an encounter with an individual, a Dom. Met on here, chatted quite a bit, and met up for the first time last night. All fine and dandy. We discussed a few more things over coffee and bingets (SP?) I was asked if I wanted to go for a ride elsewhere in the city to his favorite bar, no problem, a few drinks would be nice. Oh wait he forgot something at his house, "it will take me just a moment, please step inside" Again, no problem, not until he came up behind me, "Lets see how good of a sub you are..." as he reached down my shirt. I chicken winged that SOB and left.

Now that I've shared that I ask this: What is ok for a first date? Maybe I over reacted, but last I checked, at least for myself, true submission is gained through trust, trust is build off of respect, and for either of those you have to get to know one another. Am I wrong in this ideal? I mean he's the third one to try and pull some shit like that. I'm done.


Whoa; all those chiche'd dating faux pas' and you didn't see anything coming - *three* different times???

Uncouth or not, some "doms" are no different to the average vanilla horndog. Forget what you don't know about the lifestyle and go with what you know as a woman negotiating a world laden with predators amongst the decent and honourable fellas.

Instincts girl - you've got 'em; trust 'em! NO experience necessary if you do....

Focus.


_____________________________

Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown>

Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)

(in reply to Lairaimmortelle)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 3:15:21 AM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: catize

quote:

..you know I'm right. You submissive women out there reading this know it's true. You hunters out there know it's true.


When we fail to see prospective partners as human, we lose our humanity. A date is a date, whether we are kinky or not. To think giving yourself the title of 'dominant' negates the rights of another because they have labeled themselves submissive is as wrong as rape .
Submissive equals prey/victim??? Not the way I see it, not in my world.


quoted for truth.

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to catize)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 3:49:26 AM   
clitwhipscream


Posts: 17
Joined: 10/23/2010
Status: offline
quote:

Finally, I suggest these realities are known by most submissves who actually meet and date Doms from here and FL or in LIfestyle clubs accross this big world. They know the prey dynamic is very much there from minute one even if only subconsciously. It is why they are here and not on Match.com. It is what they want. It's what we want.


That is what makes us different from vanilla people. If I wanted a man who would treat me like a lady, I would be on match dot com (can’t stand that site). I would also become terribly, terribly bored with him, and quickly.

Doms don’t play fair. Some lie, some steal, some cheat, some just withhold information (strong silent type) ALL of them will mind fuck you. Deal with it.

Look, I will never understand why some people insist on living what they think is an "alternative" sexual lifestyle, while at the same time trying to mainstream it into vanilla hood. I have talked to "doms" who claim to want a sub who is completely enthralled and focused on his needs, and yet, "still has a mind of her own". l have seen so called sadistic "tops" who would not dream of causing pain to a bottom. Submissives talking about how they insist on having a say in how the house is run, but want to be fully controlled at the same time. And best of all, bottoms who do not want to be 'pursued' by a top, but who want to call all the shots while s/he sits on the bench and waits for the verdict to come in. When is it ok for him to startle you, to woo you, to impress you with his sexual prowess, on your wedding night? Better watch it, he just might tear your Lilly white dress by then.

Some of the submissives really get me, because they seem to want to lead the top into trouble, they don’t make boundaries clear, get into cars with strange men (really, that many of them? Your shitting me?) seem to do everything they can to say “chase me”, then clobber him when he does, so s/he can go tell whomever will listen what a victim s/he is, and what an asshole s/he is. Seriously. And I’m a feminist.

People who do not recognize the predator/prey dynamic in BDSM relationships need more help than this forum can ever provide. I could throw in five years of social science studies 20years of living leather, and wow you queer theory, gender theory, and a good deal of eco-feminist theory, but really, that is not what I am here for. If you don’t want a dominant ass for a lover, if you want someone who will never raise a hand to touch your pristine form, stay away from leathermen. It is not fair that someone should go to jail, because you cannot accept what WE ALL are.

I am a sexual deviant and if another deviant wants acceptance, compassion and understanding, and maybe even some help finding a way to express that deviance, I am more than happy to help. After all, I have many of the same desires myself.


< Message edited by clitwhipscream -- 11/14/2010 4:44:06 AM >


_____________________________

Sometimes, you just have to be thankfull you have a belt to tighten!

(in reply to Focus50)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 3:54:11 AM   
sunshinemiss


Posts: 17673
Joined: 11/26/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
I'm a hunter.



I've heard you called a lot of things Art, and "hunter" wasn't one of them.

To the OP: 
Lots and lots of "doms" will try to wrap up their wank want with a lot of bdsm-babble.  (that's what you got from your idjit).  Just because a man says he's a "dom" (or a "hunter" or a "man" for that matter), doesn't mean he is. 

THEY MUST PROVE IT.  Seriously. 

If someone said "I'm a gynecologist" would you drop your knickers?  If someone said, "I'm an accountant" would you hand over your checkbook?  Being interested in submission / bottoming / whatever you wanna call it does not mean you put your brain on pause.  Think about your best friend, your neice, your sister.  If she went into a stranger's house after taking a ride in a car with a stranger, what would you say to her?  Go to the mirror and say that to yourself.

Best,
sunshine

_____________________________

Yes, I am a wonton hussy... and still sweet as 3.14

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 4:00:54 AM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline
hear hear, Sunnnylicious!

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to sunshinemiss)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 4:07:19 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

quote:

ORIGINAL: catize

quote:

..you know I'm right. You submissive women out there reading this know it's true. You hunters out there know it's true.


When we fail to see prospective partners as human, we lose our humanity. A date is a date, whether we are kinky or not. To think giving yourself the title of 'dominant' negates the rights of another because they have labeled themselves submissive is as wrong as rape .
Submissive equals prey/victim??? Not the way I see it, not in my world.



Greetings,

The reality is a Dom/sub date is not the same date in a vanilla relationship in the making . Trust me or not.

It's because we are not dating here in the traditional sense. Safe and sane? The reality is it is a great slogan and we do pay lip service to that and even talk about safe words but I've never run into a submissive that I could trust to utter a safe word (unless G_ddamn is a safe word) and many or even most are quite capable of following the lead of a Dom they may have just met. After all, being submissve in the BDSM or Gorean world does not mean you are not aggressive or adventuresome in following your desires. It is in their nature. So, the OP is not unusual in what she did when she got into his car and followed where he led on the first date. All submissives I have met real time followed where I led on the first date. I am not unique in that experience.

Another reality is the prey dynamic does figure quite strong in dating here and to a more "under the covers" extent in munches and a much bigger than life extent in most Lifestyle Clubs and dungeons (I said "dungeons", think about it).

Reality is also that "the prey", the female submissive, is not less human or of low quality or treated as "less human" for following their primal desires and instincts. Quite the opposite. In fact, I submit to you that they are more human than most in doing so.

Finally, I suggest these realities are known by most submissves who actually meet and date Doms from here and FL or in LIfestyle clubs accross this big world. They know the prey dynamic is very much there from minute one even if only subconsciously. It is why they are here and not on Match.com. It is what they want. It's what we want.

Respectfully,

Arturas



Arturas' passage bolded and italicized to indicate the part I disagree with most.

There's a HUGE difference in leading if I lead the conversation or order for a woman, and if I grab them and try to force myself on them.  It's called manners, protocol, civilized behavior... you get the idea.

Being a Dom does NOT mean that I follow my own rules everywhere and reject ethical and for that matter lawful behavior.  Saying that I'm a Dom is not carte blanche for boorish and criminal behavior.

For that matter, I have actually met real live submissives who I did not choose to lead on the first date.  And I've known some who were more than ready to give themselves over to a Dom who had proven himself to be a match for them, but not until then.  The idea that a submissive is submissive to just any ol' self-called Dom is just as silly as the idea of the Dom who strides through life, barking commands to all objects, animate and inanimate alike.

OP, some of the viewpoints you have been given imply that a Dom and a sub are just that, and that that dynamic trumps relating to each other as people.  I disagree, strongly.


_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 4:15:33 AM   
BonesFromAsh


Posts: 1362
Joined: 6/17/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: clitwhipscream


Doms dont play fair. Some lie, some steal, some cheat, some just withhold information (strong silent type). Deal with it.



Is this what is to be expected and accepted of those who identify as dominant?

Is it really wrong to expect more?

(in reply to clitwhipscream)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 5:46:40 AM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: clitwhipscream

quote:

Finally, I suggest these realities are known by most submissves who actually meet and date Doms from here and FL or in LIfestyle clubs accross this big world. They know the prey dynamic is very much there from minute one even if only subconsciously. It is why they are here and not on Match.com. It is what they want. It's what we want.


That is what makes us different from vanilla people. If I wanted a man who would treat me like a lady, I would be on match dot com (can’t stand that site). I would also become terribly, terribly bored with him, and quickly.

Doms don’t play fair. Some lie, some steal, some cheat, some just withhold information (strong silent type) ALL of them will mind fuck you. Deal with it.

Look, I will never understand why some people insist on living what they think is an "alternative" sexual lifestyle, while at the same time trying to mainstream it into vanilla hood. I have talked to "doms" who claim to want a sub who is completely enthralled and focused on his needs, and yet, "still has a mind of her own". l have seen so called sadistic "tops" who would not dream of causing pain to a bottom. Submissives talking about how they insist on having a say in how the house is run, but want to be fully controlled at the same time. And best of all, bottoms who do not want to be 'pursued' by a top, but who want to call all the shots while s/he sits on the bench and waits for the verdict to come in. When is it ok for him to startle you, to woo you, to impress you with his sexual prowess, on your wedding night? Better watch it, he just might tear your Lilly white dress by then.

Some of the submissives really get me, because they seem to want to lead the top into trouble, they don’t make boundaries clear, get into cars with strange men (really, that many of them? Your shitting me?) seem to do everything they can to say “chase me”, then clobber him when he does, so s/he can go tell whomever will listen what a victim s/he is, and what an asshole s/he is. Seriously. And I’m a feminist.

People who do not recognize the predator/prey dynamic in BDSM relationships need more help than this forum can ever provide. I could throw in five years of social science studies 20years of living leather, and wow you queer theory, gender theory, and a good deal of eco-feminist theory, but really, that is not what I am here for. If you don’t want a dominant ass for a lover, if you want someone who will never raise a hand to touch your pristine form, stay away from leathermen. It is not fair that someone should go to jail, because you cannot accept what WE ALL are.

I am a sexual deviant and if another deviant wants acceptance, compassion and understanding, and maybe even some help finding a way to express that deviance, I am more than happy to help. After all, I have many of the same desires myself.



I have to say that if you really feel the way about D/s relationships that is expressed here, I don't know whether to laugh, cry or pity you.  I am sure you don't care one way or the other, but I have to add....

No matter what we are, deviant, pristine, church goer, psychopath, make, female, dom, sub, top, bottom, what ever, no matter what we identify as, we are all human with emotions and brains. 

If I ever begin to believe that I am only prey, and that I wwill have to endure a mindfuck from anyone I get involved with, I will run. 

I am sure you live and believe the things you said here, and I am glad it worked out for you thus far, but please do not try to tell those of us who do not live a "leatherman" lifestyle that we are wrong.  One can give over complete control, as naturally as breathing, to someone they respect and want to please just because. 

Some of us require no games, no lies, no mindfucks.  Just that click of chemistry and meeting of the minds, which is, in some ways, the same as vanilla folks do it.

Because we are pervs does not make us special.....

_____________________________

yep

(in reply to clitwhipscream)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 6:33:40 AM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas
The reality is a Dom/sub date is not the same date in a vanilla relationship in the making . Trust me or not.


You're wrong. You may not want to establish a friendship, to discover if you actually enjoy talking to the other person, looking forward to her company, find her someone smart/funny/wise/whatever floats your boat. But as every woman here has told you, that is what we want. So when you come off as mighty hunter who doesn't listen to a word she says, you lose the opportunity to discover if there is any compatibility, you lose the opportunity to have any future interaction. Because we file you right away in the loser category.


_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 7:49:18 AM   
catize


Posts: 3020
Joined: 3/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

The reality is a Dom/sub date is not the same date in a vanilla relationship in the making .


Although the potential is there for a D/s relationship, that happens later. I see the first few dates as getting to know each other and to see if we are compatible. My experience is that just as many men from the non-kinky world also assume quite a bit and they are just as wrong to do so.

quote:

Trust me or not.


Or not.


quote:

It's because we are not dating here in the traditional sense. Safe and sane. All submissives I have met real time followed where I led on the first date. I am not unique in that experience.



I would think a dominant would prefer to have someone submit to them with the knowledge of what it will mean; eyes wide open. Subterfuge and lies to lure the 'prey' tells me you can't rely on the truth of what you want/expect in order to get it.



quote:

Finally, I suggest these realities are known by most submissves who actually meet and date Doms from here and FL or in LIfestyle clubs accross this big world. They know the prey dynamic is very much there from minute one even if only subconsciously. It is why they are here and not on Match.com. It is what they want. It's what we want.



I don't date or meet dominants anymore because I have what I need and want. When I was still looking, I never considered myself as prey nor did the men I'm still with believe that they had the right to bag me and tag me and drag me home.

< Message edited by catize -- 11/14/2010 8:15:13 AM >


_____________________________

"Power is real. But it's a lot less real if it's not perceived as power."
Robert Parker, Stranger in Paradise

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 7:59:08 AM   
sunshinemiss


Posts: 17673
Joined: 11/26/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BonesFromAsh


quote:

ORIGINAL: clitwhipscream


Doms dont play fair. Some lie, some steal, some cheat, some just withhold information (strong silent type). Deal with it.



Is this what is to be expected and accepted of those who identify as dominant?



No, my dear Bones.  That is what we call UTTER HORSESHIT where I come from. 

_____________________________

Yes, I am a wonton hussy... and still sweet as 3.14

(in reply to BonesFromAsh)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 8:07:59 AM   
catize


Posts: 3020
Joined: 3/7/2006
Status: offline

quote:

Being a Dom does NOT mean that I follow my own rules everywhere and reject ethical and for that matter lawful behavior. Saying that I'm a Dom is not carte blanche for boorish and criminal behavior.




< Message edited by catize -- 11/14/2010 8:13:40 AM >


_____________________________

"Power is real. But it's a lot less real if it's not perceived as power."
Robert Parker, Stranger in Paradise

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 8:50:34 AM   
BonesFromAsh


Posts: 1362
Joined: 6/17/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss

No, my dear Bones.  That is what we call UTTER HORSESHIT where I come from. 


Damn that lack of sarcasm font, yet again.

Yeah...horse, bull, chicken...any would apply.

(in reply to sunshinemiss)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 9:05:18 AM   
OsideGirl


Posts: 14413
Joined: 7/1/2005
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: clitwhipscream
That is what makes us different from vanilla people. If I wanted a man who would treat me like a lady, I would be on match dot com (can’t stand that site).
I wouldn't be with someone that didn't treat me like a lady on the first date.

_____________________________

Give a girl the right shoes and she will conquer the world. ~ Marilyn Monroe

The Accelerated Velocity of Terminological Inexactitude

(in reply to clitwhipscream)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 9:18:19 AM   
blushingflower


Posts: 144
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
I cannot believe the number of people implying that somehow this is your fault.  If he had raped you, would it have been your fault?  No, So him groping you without your consent isn't your fault either.  It's unfortunate that your creep radar didn't go off sooner, especially with his attempts to get you alone (in a car, in his house, etc), but he's the one who made the active choice to touch you without your consent.  In most states, touching someone without their consent is assault, plain and simple.  And if someone is ostensibly trying to create a relationship based on trust, why would you violate that trust on the first date?

If this is the third time this has happened to you, I wonder if maybe you're missing signals about who these guys are and what they're expecting.  Sometimes, we think we're on the same page, but we're not.  And sometimes we send of the "helpless clueless newbie" vibe (even when we're not) and creeps try to take advantage of it.  Or maybe you've just had a run of bad luck.

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/14/2010 9:19:23 AM   
NuevaVida


Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

The reality is a Dom/sub date is not the same date in a vanilla relationship in the making . Trust me or not.


My first couple of dates with my owner were no different than non-D/s dates.  We were getting to know each other as people.  There was no leading or following; just a meeting at a nice restaurant for wine and calamari, and a walk down the harbor to talk while the sun was setting. 

There is no trust you or not.  Not everyone conducts the beginnings of D/s or M/s relationships like you do.

quote:


It's because we are not dating here in the traditional sense. Safe and sane? The reality is it is a great slogan and we do pay lip service to that and even talk about safe words but I've never run into a submissive that I could trust to utter a safe word (unless
G_ddamn is a safe word) and many or even most are quite capable of following the lead of a Dom they may have just met.



Capable, yes.  Willing, is a different story.  I would not have followed his lead right off the bat, and I didn't.  I could have, but it was more important to me to get to know and trust the person I would be submitting to, first, and that does not happen over one dinner.  Until ownership is given over, I own myself, and I am very careful about what I allow for myself. 


quote:


After all, being submissve in the BDSM or Gorean world does not mean you are not aggressive or adventuresome in following your desires. It is in their nature.



Not universally.  Some of the best leaders I know are not aggressive at all, actually.  There is something to be said for silent power.  This is what attracts me - the un-aggressive demeanor that compels me.  I'm not a fan of bulls in china shops.


quote:


So, the OP is not unusual in what she did when she got into his car and followed where he led on the first date. All submissives I have met real time followed where I led on the first date. I am not unique in that experience.



This is your experience because the women you have chosen to take out are the type who would follow your lead.  Do not confuse that with any universal stamp out there, that all submissives (or even most) are like this.  While you are not unique in your experience, your experience would be unique to someone who dates women who don't prefer aggressiveness.


quote:


Another reality is the prey dynamic does figure quite strong in dating here and to a more "under the covers" extent in munches and a much bigger than life extent in most Lifestyle Clubs and dungeons (I said "dungeons", think about it).

Reality is also that "the prey", the female submissive, is not less human or of low quality or treated as "less human" for following their primal desires and instincts. Quite the opposite. In fact, I submit to you that they are more human than most in doing so.



This is where your thinking differs from others.  You are speaking as though the "prey" dynamic is the norm, or the universal dynamic throughout the world of BDSM.  While it is a popular one, it is not for everyone. 

And I disagree with the notion that "prey" is more human than non-prey.  There are a myriad of personality types in the world, and so many ways in which dominance and submission can be expressed.  None are more or less human than any other.


quote:


Finally, I suggest these realities are known by most submissves who actually meet and date Doms from here and FL or in LIfestyle clubs accross this big world. They know the prey dynamic is very much there from minute one even if only subconsciously. It is why they are here and not on Match.com. It is what they want. It's what we want.



I met my owner here on CM.  And in the discussions I see here and on FL, where I also actively participate in discussions, not everyone recognizes submission/slavery as "prey", and not everyone is open to aggressively being grabbed on the first date.

I understand and respect that your preferences are what they are; but they are not everybody's.



To the OP:  The situation here seems like a breakdown of expectations.  If this is your third situation with a man whose advances you did not want, I would suggest discussing expectations of how you each see a relationship unfolding, before you go out.  Then there's no risk of serious miscommunication or unwanted advances. For example, in the conversations my owner and I had before we met, I let him know I was the only one looking out for myself at the time, and I had to be smart about where I put myself.  I was very careful about who and what I submitted to, and it was important to me that there would be no sex until I was in a committed relationship.  I let him know this early on, to avoid any mixed signals or erroneous expectations.  He could choose to continue or not, at that point, but I was not going to compromise myself again. 

The bumpy road I had taken prior to meeting him gave me some important life lessons that I took into this relationship.  All we can do is learn from our mishaps and use those lessons to create a better present and future.

What is OK for a first date is completely up to you.  For some, wild groping and sex would be the bomb.  For others, it would be a turn-off, and for others, it would be completely offensive.  Laying out expectations up front can help you avoid being in unwanted situations. 


_____________________________

Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.



(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.174