Collarchat.com

Join Our Community
Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 11:03:22 AM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fellowtraveler


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

I respect you even though that opinion calls me ignorant. It's an opinion that is text book.

...

There are still controls here. You know what they are.

...


In the real world we're Dom's and submissives and not children. We are not textbook by choice but these submissives do not just get into a car without taking some safety measures so let's not pretend they are ignorant and the Dom is ignorant for inviting her.

The prey still has claws.

Be well,
Arturas




Arturas, I must respectfully disagree. In the first place, this is a site where anyone can post.... not just good and decent people. To make matters worse, a woman who claims to have been attacked by someone she met here is not going to be in a good position in court.... given the nature of the public perception of D/s. We DO need to be wary of people until we know them. That goes more for adults than children, IMO.

In the "vanilla" world, it is common for a man to pick a woman up in his car for a first date. I, however, would not recommend it for people meeting folks from this site for the first time. As a dominant man, I would not take a first time "date" in my car.... for one thing because I don't know what she will try to claim happened and for another because I want her to feel at ease. I will take control when she is comfortable, if that ever happens. If not... I will move on.

I will acknowledge that my post fell into the age-old trap of trying to claim that a "real" dom does this or does not do that. I apologize for that. I should have said that the act was ignorant and left it at that.

As for calling you personally ignorant, I have no knowledge of you and thus am not qualified to say one way or another. The act though, yeah, I would call it ignorant or at best naive. There again, I do things that others might well consider ignorant.



Once my tam caused a problem online. I wrote she would be whipped for it. This triggered several people to spend over a page or two lecturering me on the legality of this and the potential to cause harm, on the rights of the individual and how I would be jailed for causing this girl harm. It is much the same with these replies. More lecture from those who assume the worst of people. I still respect you but suggest your reply is much the same. They never considered she is an alpha submissive who enjoys being whipped and it is being performed in a monitored dungeon setting and that I was trained and skilled to perform this action.

Things never change.

Respectfully,
Arturas

(in reply to fellowtraveler)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 11:33:58 AM   
BonesFromAsh


Posts: 1362
Joined: 6/17/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


It is much the same with these replies. More lecture from those who assume the worst of people.



You and your partner were not meeting for the first time when your discussion of punishment took place. The OP and the man she referred to in the original post were.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lairaimmortelle
I've had an encounter with an individual, a Dom. Met on here, chatted quite a bit, and met up for the first time last night.


You're comparing apples and oranges.



(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 11:52:56 AM   
Lockit


Posts: 11292
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Once my tam caused a problem online. I wrote she would be whipped for it. This triggered several people to spend over a page or two lecturering me on the legality of this and the potential to cause harm, on the rights of the individual and how I would be jailed for causing this girl harm. It is much the same with these replies. More lecture from those who assume the worst of people. I still respect you but suggest your reply is much the same. They never considered she is an alpha submissive who enjoys being whipped and it is being performed in a monitored dungeon setting and that I was trained and skilled to perform this action.

Things never change.

Respectfully,
Arturas


So you decided to show everyone that for causing trouble on the boards you were going to give her punishment which meant that you were rewarding her? That doesn't make sense. Your posts don't make sense. You sound good to a point and then some inconsistency or egomakingtrippinyouup goes on. You punish with something she likes. You claim to be uber dom, know how to read women and hunt well... and yet somehow, some way, over and over again, you give the impression that you are talking in between burps.


_____________________________

No matter how old a woman gets, some men will think she was born yesterday! ROFL... I love this place!


(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 12:11:16 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lockit

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Once my tam caused a problem online. I wrote she would be whipped for it. This triggered several people to spend over a page or two lecturering me on the legality of this and the potential to cause harm, on the rights of the individual and how I would be jailed for causing this girl harm. It is much the same with these replies. More lecture from those who assume the worst of people. I still respect you but suggest your reply is much the same. They never considered she is an alpha submissive who enjoys being whipped and it is being performed in a monitored dungeon setting and that I was trained and skilled to perform this action.

Things never change.

Respectfully,
Arturas


So you decided to show everyone that for causing trouble on the boards you were going to give her punishment which meant that you were rewarding her? That doesn't make sense. Your posts don't make sense. You sound good to a point and then some inconsistency or egomakingtrippinyouup goes on. You punish with something she likes. You claim to be uber dom, know how to read women and hunt well... and yet somehow, some way, over and over again, you give the impression that you are talking in between burps.




So, I violated some rule here on her punishment? I am sorry you don't like how I handled her punishment. I enjoyed it however. You'll just have to excuse me for doing that my way.



(in reply to Lockit)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 12:23:47 PM   
Lockit


Posts: 11292
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
I don't care how you punish her or if you do or don't. You just seem to miss what I am saying. You are inconsistent or playing some game. You say you are going to punish her for doing something online. What would be your motive in telling people that? She had publicly upset people or you and you were acting all domly like you were going to punish her and yet you spoke of rewarding her just now.

My comment is about your presentation and words and even what your motivation is. Care to address saying one thing one moment and appearing to do or be some way and then excusing yourself when criticized, with how she loves spankings?


_____________________________

No matter how old a woman gets, some men will think she was born yesterday! ROFL... I love this place!


(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 12:43:10 PM   
leadership527


Posts: 5026
Joined: 6/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NuevaVida
I felt the need to submit to my owner on our first date, but I did not allow myself to.  Nor did he want me to.  We both had reasons for that.

*laughs* I'm sure you did. Carol and I have had reasons at various times too. Those reasons didn't help us any. The "not submitting" was a paper thin layer of wallpaper over the same structure that was always there. So now the question to you is... "So yeah, on the surface you 'stopped yourself from submitting'. But did that actually change anything? I'm guessing no *laughs*.


_____________________________

~Jeff

I didn't so much "enslave" Carol as I did "enlove" her. - Me
I want a joyous, loving, respectful relationship where the male is in charge and deserves to be. - DavanKael

(in reply to NuevaVida)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 12:57:02 PM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
Arturas, the rule you violated is that you never punish your sub by doing something she enjoys. That's like punishing an eight year old with ice cream when he breaks a window.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to leadership527)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 1:00:39 PM   
NuevaVida


Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527

quote:

ORIGINAL: NuevaVida
I felt the need to submit to my owner on our first date, but I did not allow myself to.  Nor did he want me to.  We both had reasons for that.

*laughs* I'm sure you did. Carol and I have had reasons at various times too. Those reasons didn't help us any. The "not submitting" was a paper thin layer of wallpaper over the same structure that was always there. So now the question to you is... "So yeah, on the surface you 'stopped yourself from submitting'. But did that actually change anything? I'm guessing no *laughs*.



LOL actually, it did.  We both had reasons we needed to move forward very slowly.  I began submitting to him, yes, but it came forward in baby steps.  We both felt this was (is) something that is going to last - something different than we've experienced before - and felt we had all the time in the world to "get there."  What's the hurry, after all? 

The result is a foundation based on love that we both completely trust.  I'm not sure we'd have created the same foundation if he had assumed total authority sooner than he did.  We're still under 2 years old.  There's still a lot we want to experience together, but are waiting on.  The deliberate "slowness" has been significantly effective.  Then again, I came from a place of needing to feel emotionally safe.  And you don't get that straight out of the starting gate - not at the level we needed, anyway.


_____________________________

Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.



(in reply to leadership527)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 1:10:44 PM   
clitwhipscream


Posts: 17
Joined: 10/23/2010
Status: offline
quote:

So we are prey and predator eh? Dominant is stronger because dominant is predator and seeking prey (is) our nature because damn, a dominant is most typically is a man right?


Not in my world it isnt, and where in my posts whould you even find that assumtion? Did I forget to genderfuck a pronoun? If I did, I apologize.

I knew the Dom I play with now for four years before anything went down. He got it, becasue hes a damn nice man, and he prooved it over time, just by being his sweet self, not because he is a dom. That dosent mean he dosent make me nervous, he does and always has. I fucking love it and thats why one day I went to his house and deliberately ran across his path. (I gave him my safeword within two minutes of walking in the door). I asked him during the conversaton, several times, to push me over my own resistance and he pounced. Lucky for me. Now I have this great friend who fucks me silly once a week or so. And he is georgeous.

His housemate (a super funny super slutty Domme) keeps an eye on things so we dont get to rough and break all the furniture and in effect acts as a spotter, FOR HIM. Because right now, I could go to the cops and report him for rape, and he would at minimum have his reputation trashed at worst get jail time. Im not that kind of girl, but on original pounce, he did not know that. That took kahoonas.

I wouldnt call a cop if I were raped, a lawyer and a reporter yes from the er, but not a cop. Oh Im sure they would stick thier nose in it and I would employ them, to help me track down my own rapist (becasuse I owe him one). But I like cops only slightly less than I like rapists. Im just funny that way. I take care of me, no one else. In my experience, crawling into the arms of a patriachal legal system is not the best path out of gender oppression in fact, it is designed to reinforce it. Thats why rape vicitms speaks so much of being re-raped by the system.

The person best qualified to take care of you is yourself. That is not required becasue you are a woman in 'mans world', but becasue you are a human and you live in the real world.











< Message edited by clitwhipscream -- 11/15/2010 1:18:19 PM >


_____________________________

Sometimes, you just have to be thankfull you have a belt to tighten!

(in reply to NuevaVida)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 1:14:01 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BonesFromAsh


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


It is much the same with these replies. More lecture from those who assume the worst of people.



You and your partner were not meeting for the first time when your discussion of punishment took place. The OP and the man she referred to in the original post were.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lairaimmortelle
I've had an encounter with an individual, a Dom. Met on here, chatted quite a bit, and met up for the first time last night.


You're comparing apples and oranges.





Do you think so? I don't. My tam and I were not strangers when this punishment took place and the OP and the Dom were strangers; that is true. But that fact has little to do with my post. You see, the point is that in both cases people wrote back thinking the worse of us in what they perceived to be a high risk adventure, apples to apples, and in my case they wrote back that I was going to do something terrible to tam and illegal. Now in the case of the OP, many wrote that she was being foolish and she and the Dom acted in an "ignorant" manner.

I know many postings on CM are made those well meaning with textbook answers suggesting things like safe words and having several phone conversations first and even a meeting first over dinner would make things fundamentally different and safer and "less ignorant". You who are experienced in dating on vanilla Match.com as well as CM know better.

Indeed, those who think it is dangerous to be led by a Dom on the first meeting simply because it is the first meeting are dead wrong. OMG, why? Because it is no safer to jump in a Dom's car for the first time on the tenth meeting than the first meeting; in either situation you equally must have in place safety measures to protect yourself. I will even go so far as to suggest it is safer to go into a Dom's car on the first meeting since you will surely have safety measures in place then and will less likely have them in place on the fifth or tenth meeting after being disarmed by his smile and concern over your 'interest and limits' sheet you both went over last week after five meetings and you decide it's not necessary to call in his license plate to your safety contact back at home base.

Finally, I don't have any lectures for the OP. I make no such judgments. I and many more here know what's real and and those who disagree are free to lecture us on our perceived failings. I respect that.

Naturally, I am free to set it straight.

Well wishes
Arturas.


< Message edited by Arturas -- 11/15/2010 1:19:06 PM >

(in reply to BonesFromAsh)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 1:15:56 PM   
Lockit


Posts: 11292
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: clitwhipscream

quote:

So we are prey and predator eh? Dominant is stronger because dominant is predator and seeking prey (is) our nature because damn, a dominant is most typically is a man right?


Not in my world it isnt, and where in my posts whould you even find that assumtion? Did I forget to genderfuck a pronoun? If I did, I apologize.



I didn't base an assumption from your post and you were not the only one that spoke of the predator and prey.

< Message edited by Lockit -- 11/15/2010 1:17:02 PM >


_____________________________

No matter how old a woman gets, some men will think she was born yesterday! ROFL... I love this place!


(in reply to clitwhipscream)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 1:17:51 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

Arturas, the rule you violated is that you never punish your sub by doing something she enjoys. That's like punishing an eight year old with ice cream when he breaks a window.



So, you are smarting from my last reply and suddenly now I have a rule you force on me and mine? I'll be sure an remember that next time...she is mine, I enjoyed her acting up where she acted up and I punished her as I saw fit.
Get over it again.

Be well,
Arturas

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 1:28:22 PM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

Arturas, the rule you violated is that you never punish your sub by doing something she enjoys. That's like punishing an eight year old with ice cream when he breaks a window.



So, you are smarting from my last reply and suddenly now I have a rule you force on me and mine? I'll be sure an remember that next time...she is mine, I enjoyed her acting up where she acted up and I punished her as I saw fit.
Get over it again.

Be well,
Arturas
   Your replies seem to never have a thing to do with the comments and/or questions you reply to. 

So, you fake punished her, with something that she enjoys, for fake acting up on here in a way that you enjoyed, yet Steven is the one forcing a rule on you and yours?

You sure do change mules in the middle of the stream a lot.  How the poor OP's confusion and possibly dangerous encounter became about you and your great domliness escapes me.  Please explain.

To the OP, live and learn.  Try not to make the same mistake twice.

_____________________________

yep

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 1:29:00 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: clitwhipscream

quote:

So we are prey and predator eh? Dominant is stronger because dominant is predator and seeking prey (is) our nature because damn, a dominant is most typically is a man right?


Not in my world it isnt, and where in my posts whould you even find that assumtion? Did I forget to genderfuck a pronoun? If I did, I apologize.

I knew the Dom I play with now for four years before anything went down. He got it, becasue hes a damn nice man, and he prooved it over time, just by being his sweet self, not because he is a dom. That dosent mean he dosent make me nervous, he does and always has. I fucking love it and thats why one day I went to his house and deliberately ran across his path. (I gave him my safeword within two minutes of walking in the door). I asked him during the conversaton, several times, to push me over my own resistance and he pounced. Lucky for me. Now I have this great friend who fucks me silly once a week or so. And he is georgeous.

His housemate (a super funny super slutty Domme) keeps an eye on things so we dont get to rough and break all the furniture and in effect acts as a spotter, FOR HIM. Because right now, I could go to the cops and report him for rape, and he would at minimum have his reputation trashed at worst get jail time. Im not that kind of girl, but on original pounce, he did not know that. That took kahoonas.

I wouldnt call a cop if I were raped, a lawyer and a reporter yes from the er, but not a cop. Oh Im sure they would stick thier nose in it and I would employ them, to help me track down my own rapist (becasuse I owe him one). But I like cops only slightly less than I like rapists. Im just funny that way. I take care of me, no one else. In my experience, crawling into the arms of a patriachal legal system is not the best path out of gender oppression in fact, it is designed to reinforce it. Thats why rape vicitms speaks so much of being re-raped by the system.

The person best qualified to take care of you is yourself. That is not required becasue you are a woman in 'mans world', but becasue you are a human and you live in the real world.













I love this post.

(in reply to clitwhipscream)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 1:35:39 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas


quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

Arturas, the rule you violated is that you never punish your sub by doing something she enjoys. That's like punishing an eight year old with ice cream when he breaks a window.



So, you are smarting from my last reply and suddenly now I have a rule you force on me and mine? I'll be sure an remember that next time...she is mine, I enjoyed her acting up where she acted up and I punished her as I saw fit.
Get over it again.

Be well,
Arturas
   Your replies seem to never have a thing to do with the comments and/or questions you reply to. 

So, you fake punished her, with something that she enjoys, for fake acting up on here in a way that you enjoyed, yet Steven is the one forcing a rule on you and yours?

You sure do change mules in the middle of the stream a lot.  How the poor OP's confusion and possibly dangerous encounter became about you and your great domliness escapes me.  Please explain.

To the OP, live and learn.  Try not to make the same mistake twice.



Yes. Did you not read his post? He imposes some rule I must follow.
Sorry it is not to your satisfaction. I promise to do better. What should I have said to make it better?



< Message edited by Arturas -- 11/15/2010 1:37:14 PM >

(in reply to JstAnotherSub)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 1:43:20 PM   
BonesFromAsh


Posts: 1362
Joined: 6/17/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas

Do you think so? I don't. My tam and I were not strangers when this punishment took place and the OP and the Dom were strangers; that is true. But that fact has little to do with my post. You see, the point is that in both cases people wrote back thinking the worse of us in what they perceived to be a high risk adventure, apples to apples, and in my case they wrote back that I was going to do something terrible to tam and illegal. Now in the case of the OP, many wrote that she was being foolish and she and the Dom acted in an "ignorant" manner.


The OP posted a question and people answered. Plain and simple. I see no reason to bring your own story into the picture as it doesn't related to the original question.


quote:


I know many postings on CM are made those well meaning with textbook answers suggesting things like safe words and having several phone conversations first and even a meeting first over dinner would make things fundamentally different and safer and "less ignorant". You who are experienced in dating on vanilla Match.com as well as CM know better.
Indeed, those who think it is dangerous to be led by a Dom on the first meeting simply because it is the first meeting are dead wrong. OMG, why? Because it is no safer to jump in a Dom's car for the first time on the tenth meeting than the first meeting; in either situation you equally must have in place safety measures to protect yourself. I will even go so far as to suggest it is safer to go into a Dom's car on the first meeting since you will surely have safety measures in place then and will less likely have them in place on the fifth or tenth meeting after being disarmed by his smile and concern over your 'interest and limits' sheet you both went over last week after five meetings and you decide it's not necessary to call in his license plate to your safety contact back at home base.


Which is pretty much what everyone else was saying...minus the pompastic predator attitude and the "vanilla Match.com" silliness. Common sense is universal, no?

quote:


Finally, I don't have any lectures for the OP. I make no such judgments. I and many more here know what's real and and those who disagree are free to lecture us on our perceived failings. I respect that.

Naturally, I am free to set it straight.

Well wishes
Arturas.




"Set it straight" all you want, but please try to remember what the OP asked for...
quote:

What is ok for a first date?
...which will include a certain amount of judgements shared, much like what you offered when you made this statement...

quote:



All this is good advice for dating. But we're not dating here are we? This is a hunt and you are the prey.


Now, why not respect the OP enough to not pollute HER thread seeking advice for HER problem with your punishment glories. Unless, of course, it has any bearing on her original question.



< Message edited by BonesFromAsh -- 11/15/2010 1:48:25 PM >

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 1:47:55 PM   
poise


Posts: 9509
Joined: 7/3/2010
Status: offline


_____________________________

When the path ignites a soul, there’s no remaining in place.

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 3:30:19 PM   
Arturas


Posts: 3245
Status: offline
This is star Master's slave,

As we all know, we can enjoy one thing and hate it at the same time. Depends on the situation. Did he "play" spank me, or punish me... is it you to decide? There are so many on here who know the difference in the two. Warming up, not warming up.....etc etc etc etc.....  UGGGGGG  ok back to your disagreement with Master on everything He says..... (riduculous)

Happy Holidays!!
Master's ~star~

(in reply to poise)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 3:32:22 PM   
soul2share


Posts: 7084
Joined: 12/18/2007
From: somewhere out there.....
Status: offline
Oh crap....I thought I recognized Pete and Repeat........

waits for the coming train wreck......still wonders where the little icon for that is!   This one'll hafta do......

< Message edited by soul2share -- 11/15/2010 3:33:24 PM >


_____________________________

I have to stop saying "How stupid can you be?"...people are starting to take it as a challenge!

*Not a fuck was given.*

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? - 11/15/2010 3:33:16 PM   
fellowtraveler


Posts: 26
Joined: 3/11/2009
Status: offline


quote:

ORIGINAL: Arturas








Once my tam caused a problem online. I wrote she would be whipped for it. This triggered several people to spend over a page or two lecturering me on the legality of this and the potential to cause harm, on the rights of the individual and how I would be jailed for causing this girl harm. It is much the same with these replies. More lecture from those who assume the worst of people. I still respect you but suggest your reply is much the same. They never considered she is an alpha submissive who enjoys being whipped and it is being performed in a monitored dungeon setting and that I was trained and skilled to perform this action.

Things never change.

Respectfully,
Arturas



You will have to excuse me dude, I don't know you, I don't know Tam and I could care less about your personal life with each other. I was never a part of any thread regarding your habits in whipping her nor any post she might have offered or her reasons for posting it or your reasons for announcing any such decision. This discussion, referring now to the one I was and am a part of, regards the issue of a young lady who was nearly raped because some idiot figured she would submit sexually on a first date. My advice regarded the propriety of riding in a car alone with or going to the house of somebody she knows nothing about except that she met him on a porn (kinky hook-up) site. You, in turn, pointed out that we are not children who need to be told not to talk with strangers. That was what I addressed. How often you "whip your Tam" (or Rosey Palmer or whatever name she goes by these days) is really none of my damned business.

(in reply to Arturas)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: cooth, uncooth whose to say? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.343