TwoHeartsBeatOne
Posts: 479
Joined: 10/30/2012 Status: offline
|
Thank you, AthenaSurrenders!!! While many responses have been informative and helpful, yours is the one that I have understood most easily. I appreciate it very much. I agree that this thread has been an almost completely respectful discussion of a very challenging topic. I've been on the forums long enough to have learned to trust the group for this level and depth of feedback. I really did fear even asking the questions because who wants to be known as the person who brought THIS up? And, what if I offend people, or what if they don't understand because I ask in the "wrong" way? You know, those sort of concerns. If anyone tries a search of the terms Daddy Dom + pedophile, you will see basically, "nilch, nada, nothing." Why would that be? And, the terms "age-player" and "incest-player" are not listed as BDSM interests, here on CM. Again, I appreciate the gift of your perspective. I really do. :) quote:
ORIGINAL: AthenaSurrenders Fast reply Maria has said some wonderful things and I really hope if you take nothing else away from this thread, you should really take on board what she says. When you say 'does a paedophile need the real thing?' - it depends how you look at 'need'. They need it to get aroused. That's what the term means. They don't necessarily need to act on it, but many will never be attracted to an adult, and never be able to have a successful sexual relationship with an adult. So it's not as simple as being attracted to under-tens, so having your thirty-five year old partner wear pigtails and that will do - it won't happen. An adult will never convincingly pass for a child (and I'm not talking an 18 year old pretending to be 16), there will never be the same imbalance of power, the same social-cultural ideas about innocence or any of the other things that contribute to the appeal. Even if the person was able to enjoy that type of encounter, it doesn't make the paedophilia go away. I am absolutely sympathetic to any person who finds themself wired this way and does not act on it. What a difficult life that must be! Imagine the difficulty in removing yourself from temptation, the loneliness of knowing you will likely never have an intimate relationship, the fear of others finding out and the backlash. I don't know what sort of help is out there for these people, but I'm guessing not much. People don't want to help paedophiles, even good paedophiles. In much of the UK, if you feel like you might abuse your partner or you have committed domestic abuse and you want to join a program to help you change your behaviour, you won't be eligible unless you have been convicted. There is little to no help for people who are trying to work on their issues without being forced. I imagine it is the same for paedophiles - you can't just go to Paedophiles anonymous. And if you could, would people go or would they be afraid of being outed? All in all, it's a horrible situation. So yes, I think it is possible to have a dark side and to want not to act on it. But I don't think these people become daddy doms. A domestic violence perpetrator will not be able to use BDSM to scratch the urge to knock his partner about because those desires come from different places and different parts of the personality. Some doms will also be abusive. You may well have come across one who also had a sexual attraction to underage girls. It does not mean that the majority of daddy-doms are ethical paedophiles, rather there may be some overlap in the two groups - just as there is an overlap between the groups 'daddy dom' and 'accountant' or 'cello player' and 'paedophile'. The vast majority of people who enjoy age play would be repulsed by the idea of doing sexual things with a minor. Just like the vast majority of sadists would be horrified to think of hurting someone who wanted no part of it. Having your consenting adult partner, with an adult mind and all related adult parts, dress up or speak a certain way, might be hot or enjoyable. That doesn't mean they'd get the same feelings from an actual encounter with an underage person. And as others have said, many who do age-play have no sexual contact during the time they are in that frame of mind. Others might use the term 'daddy' to denote a nurturing relationship and not at any time take part in age play. I am a parent, and I am not frightened of my child being around daddy-doms any more than I would be wary of my child being around any adult that I don't know very well. The sad fact of child sexual abuse is that abusers don't come in neatly labeled packets. The offender is often a parent, cousin, neighbour, uncle, babysitter, sports coach or other 'trustworthy' adult. I know of at least three women in my life who were sexually abused by a step-parent. That doesn't make me want to keep my child away from anyone who is a step-parent. If anything I'm sure a paedophile with the intention of victimizing my child would be unlikely to identify as a daddy-dom to me in case I drew the same conclusion as you have. What is being done to protect the innocents? Well that depends on your community. Here I know that people working with children require criminal records checks, there are extensive information-sharing protocols in place between agencies like police, health and social services, children are taught about safer-strangers, there are helplines to report concerns and every adult who comes into contact with a child is obliged to report suspected abuse. None of that relate specifically to the BDSM community, because that's for adults only. Even if I believed a certain person I meet at the dungeon might actually be attracted to children, what can I do over and above what's already happening? He or she isn't interacting with children or doing anything wrong, and may never do so. I have never seen your film. What I will say is that of the few daddy-dom relationships I know of personally, I've never known any 'grooming' to take place. Grooming suggests manipulation. In all the cases I have known, the two adults have got to know each other and negotiated the terms of their relationship on equal footing. As for the other things on your list of traits, I've seen people who have some of these across the spectrum of relationship types - doms, subs, vanilla people, etc. They are red flags but not only for paedophiles, but for all sorts of people with abusive traits or just poor relationship skills. PS. I'd like to say that this has been a very controlled and civil discussion of what is naturally a tough and distressing topic, which is great to see.
_____________________________
"Anything I can not transform into something marvelous, I let go. Reality doesn't impress me. I only believe in intoxication, in ecstasy, and when ordinary life shackles me, I escape, one way or another. No more walls.” ― Anaïs Nin
|