Collarchat.com

Join Our Community		 Collarchat.com

Home  Login  Search 

RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/27/2017 10:55:35 PM   
longwayhome


Posts: 1035
Joined: 1/9/2008
Status: offline 		Greta, you are a tight little ball of hate.

I specifically said I did not believe in going to mediation with a religious leader was a good idea. The use of the word "court" to refer to Sharia mediation is a complete misnomer. There is court. There is no Sharia law. English, Scottish and Northern Irish law (with a Supreme Court and for now the European Court) is the only law in the UK. A Sharia "court" can only offer mediation and it has no force in law. Do I like people turning to Sharia to solve disputes? No but I'm not that keen on people going to their priests for that either. I live in a democracy and if that is people's own choice and they still have the protection of UK law, I am okay with that. The article you quote in the Independent is a good example of how UK law is paramount and discrimination is being tackled. It's an example of UK law working, for goodness sake!

You really are just going to quote every crime or instance of discrimination carried out by Muslims that you can find, except that most violence towards women and rapes are carried out by white men. I do not condone any illegality that a Muslim is responsible for, but I'm not going to pick it out and highlight it over others.

So somehow Muslim violence against women is evil and but "random" violence by others is okay. No it's violence and it's all wrong, whoever does it. I don't defend Muslims who commit acts of violence, quite the opposite. The problem is that you attack all Muslims, law-abiding, peace-loving, valuable members of our community, doctors, factory workers, bus drivers, architects, Mayor of London. No these people cannot be contributing to our society.

And you then you suggest all Muslim men want to mutilate their daughters genitals or engage in paedophile acts? You must know that is not true.

The problem isn't calling out bad behaviour. The problem is characterising everyone in the same way. That makes you a bigot of the worst kind, and I am only saying that after you have used inflammatory and personally insulting language.

You yourself talked about being okay with Indians who were Christian but having a problem with Indians who were Muslim. You don't see that as prejudice? And then you think that Indians who rise into respected professions in Singapore do so because they are Christian and have Christian names. But most of the Indians in the Malay peninsula, including Singapore, are Hindu. You don't know this?

I am more than happy to criticise those who break the law, abuse children, beat women, carry out acts of terror whatever their religion. Neither I nor the UK Government are in your words "supporting this atrocity of abuse of women".

What I will not do is attack millions of people, accusing them of the worst things just because they are Muslim. That is bigotry, plain and simple.

I neither like or dislike Muslims. In fact someone's religion is not a powerful reason for me to like or dislike them - it is their words and deeds that are more important.

What I have no tolerance for is your kind of blind, ignorant discrimination and bigotry.

Oh and try not to use the word "Paki" when you next time you come to the UK. Some people do use it but it's pretty much the same as calling a black guy the "n" word.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 121
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/27/2017 11:10:43 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: longwayhome
So somehow Muslim violence against women is evil and but "random" violence by others is okay. No it's violence and it's all wrong, whoever does it. I don't defend Muslims who commit acts of violence, quite the opposite. The problem is that you attack all Muslims, law-abiding, peace-loving, valuable members of our community, doctors, factory workers, bus drivers, architects, Mayor of London. No these people cannot be contributing to our society.


I am talking about the systematic abuse of women, and Muslims being 1.6billion in population, have a religion that mandates it! So systematic eradication of abuse of women starts with tackling the ONE GIANT religion that abuses women FIRST!

The Random fellows who abuses women that are Non-Muslims, are already getting punished for it!

Muslims in Sharia law runned countries are NOT being punished YET because it's legal.

I highly doubt white men abuse women the most, since MANY Muslims women are decked in Ninja Suits from head to toe, so how many go unreported? Nobody will know. Nobody will see. And they are at the mercies of their Muslim husbands. Just look at how Janet Jackson has to dress when walking beside her husband? IF she had bruises, and she kept quiet, would you know? Even in her shows, she had to fully cover up now. Which makes me suspect she has bruises on her body.

quote:

And you then you suggest all Muslim men want to mutilate their daughters genitals or engage in paedophile acts? You must know that is not true.

100% of Muslims men in Singapore mutilate their daughter's pussy. FGM is COMPULSORY for Muslim females in Singapore BY THEIR RELIGION. Good enough reason for me to hate them.

quote:

You yourself talked about being okay with Indians who were Christian but having a problem with Indians who were Muslim. You don't see that as prejudice?


Please re-read the above. IF I am prejudice against MEN who send their daughters to get their pussy mutilated, then yes, I am proud to be prejudice AGAINST MEN who SUPPORT FGM! Why should I even like them? That is HORRIBLE!
quote:

And then you think that Indians who rise into respected professions in Singapore do so because they are Christian and have Christian names. But most of the Indians in the Malay peninsula, including Singapore, are Hindu. You don't know this?

Not true today. I am talking about Singapore. Not Malaysia. We are two different countries. Most are Christians or Atheist these days. Many have evolved out of their traditional religion. The Indians that is! Probably also because, unlike Islam, the retention rate for Malays that are Muslims are 100% because they are forbidden to leave their religion.

quote:

What I will not do is attack millions of people, accusing them of the worst things just because they are Muslim. That is bigotry, plain and simple.

Who is following a prophet that lead by example in child marriages, FGM, killing, and wife beating. And if I know my friend is a wife beater and not a Muslim, he will no longer be my friend. Period! I don't care IF that is bigotry not to support wife beaters! I will NOT befriend wife beaters!
quote:

Oh and try not to use the word "Paki" when you next time you come to the UK. Some people do use it but it's pretty much the same as calling a black guy the "n" word.

Well in Singapore, Paki is short form for Pakistani. There is no difference between Pakistani and Paki. And if they are from Pakistan? How is referring to their nationality racist? Or offensive? Are they embarrassed or ashamed of their nationality? Or was it YOU British people WHO turn a short form of "Pakistani" into an "insult" when it's just a simple logical short-form of their nationality?

"Nigger" I understand. That word is sooo far away from African. I would call Africans, "Afri"! Like they are Paki people, they are Afri people. "malaysia" becomes "malay" and they are Malay people. And Singaporeans, Sing people. Sometimes if I met a fellow Singaporean overseas, I would ask, "Are you a singy?"

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 4/27/2017 11:21:17 PM >

(in reply to longwayhome)
Profile   Post #: 122
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/28/2017 5:02:54 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
quote:

Considering Muhammad married a 9 yr old. How can a 9 yr old give consent?


Isabella of Valois was married at age seven to King Richard II and was Queen Consort of England.

Edward, we are talking about a fucking prophet who is the messenger of God! Even IF he was ignorant. You'd think his God would inform him that fucking 9 yr olds IS NOT OKAY!

A King is not responsible for claiming that his practices is what God wants him to do and others to follow in order to go to heaven.

You are the one championing Islam as THE RELIGION that gives women a CHOICE in marriage!

Alot of Kings are fucking assholes and perverts and corrupted and evil.

But a Prophet of God? THE ORIGINATOR of a religion that 1.6 Billion people follows him as the role model for them? He is held to higher standards!

It is your own sick head that thinks every marriage as elicited or evoked from custom law for royals or 'nobles' or whomever, from or by whatever cultural standard of the day, resulted in immediate sexual consummation. Please keep your own personal fantasies out of the discussion.

Moses and Jesus did not very pleasant things. Acting far from God in many cases.

Unless you provide, by modern standard of evidence, that Mohamed had sex with the 9 yr. old and Richard II didn't have sex with the 7 yr. old (highly unlikely to have occurred in either case, and certainly no evidence of it either way), then shut your trap.

Marriages were per-arraigned and per-ordained as much in the West as anywhere else in the world before and after Mohamed. There were 3 month-old husbands and kings if the need arose to suit the law of the time, some regency in place to deal with matters while the brat getting to adulthood.

So in any case, what is your point about 'being a prophet of God'?

We now let the course of society to be determined by "Trickle-down theory" and "Fighting terrorism!" after we sell anthrax to Iraq and deal cocaine for the Contras, deregulate the banks and set that dog pack upon society, and, just like the hyper-hypocritical European countries do, sell as many guns and chemicals and bio-warfare agents against nature and humanity as we can to everybody in the world.





< Message edited by Edwird -- 4/28/2017 5:21:06 PM >

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 123
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/28/2017 10:35:04 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
Moses and Jesus did not very pleasant things. Acting far from God in many cases.

Seriously..., what was the most unpleasant thing that Jesus did? Let's compare it to the most unpleasant thing that Muhammad did.

At least Jesus is not guilty of promoting FGM, not guilty of marrying an underage, not guilty of committing murder, not guilty of encouraging wife beating. What bad things has he taught his followers?

quote:

Unless you provide, by modern standard of evidence, that Mohamed had sex with the 9 yr. old

WTF every Imam on earth agrees that Muhammad sex with Aisha at 9 yr old. It was even recorded in their authentic holy text! And since the act was consummated like gazillion years ago, no we cannot get modern DNA evidence or do a virginity check on her at 9 yr old! We can only rely on the words of the woman HERSELF! That she is telling the truth. You know another funny thing, this incident was shared by the victim herself. And then you got all these modern men like you screaming that she is lying! Her accounts are false!

“ Narrated 'Aisha:

that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that 'Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death)." what you know of the Quran (by heart)' ”
Sahih Bukhari, Volume 7, Book 62, Number 65:
http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/hadith/bukhari/062-sbt.php

There is Zero Muslim countries in this world that would not respect the authenticity historical records of the Hadith Sahih Bukhari. And that is Aisha herself saying that she was fucked at 9 yr old.

And again, if ya have no idea how Islam work. The Quran is Muhammad's words. The Authentic Hadiths are the the guide to how to correctly interpretate the Quran.



< Message edited by Greta75 -- 4/28/2017 10:48:57 PM >

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 124
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/28/2017 11:08:24 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
So you believe an account of the matter as accounted for by religious wacko males just like the same religious wacko males who wrote everything in the old and new testament as being the authority on what some alleged 9 yr. old girl allegedly said 1,400 years ago?






(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 125
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/28/2017 11:23:24 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
So you believe an account of the matter as accounted for by religious wacko males just like the same religious wacko males who wrote everything in the old and new testament as being the authority on what some alleged 9 yr. old girl allegedly said 1,400 years ago?

Edwird, I am an atheist, I think Muhammad falsify everything and he is a fake, a con man. But the problem is, 1.6billion people believe him. And they believe Hadiths and Quran to be authentic records of the truth and the lifestyle they are meant to follow, as expected by their God. And the information inside these books, are horrendous.

So I think the world is wrong in legitimizing these books and respecting them as an authentic religion.

And my point is, there is nothing in Jehovah Witness religious teachings that is as bad as in the Hadiths and the Quran. It's just crazy that Jehovah Witnesses is seen as the bigger threat than Islam.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 4/28/2017 11:26:09 PM >

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 126
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/29/2017 1:15:26 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
How does excluding the JWs or any other christian wackos 'favor' Islam, or say that Islam is 'better'?

That is all in your sick head and a few others', thankfully not prevalent in most of society.

How do you know yourself that all 1.6 billion of the Muslim faith follow it to every last word when even they themselves can't come to agreement on much of it?

The writings of the Jews and the Christians are every bit as wacko as whatever the Muslims have in the Q'uran, if not more so. So how come you aren't saying they all adhere strictly to the 'same word'?

The creation of the universe in six days, Noah fitting every male and female animal on earth in one ship, promotion of war, the promotion of slavery, the account of chariots of fire riding through the sky, etc.

They are all crazy books, but you are trying to tell us that because the Q'uran is a crazy book, by that all 1.6 billion, and by that 'reasoning' alone, they all everyone of them believe and go by every word of it.

You eat some truly wacko crap for breakfast.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 127
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/29/2017 1:35:08 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline 		There are Muslims, there are Jews, there are Christians who all firmly believe in God, who know that the original books were meant to speak to the audience of those times and do not think that every original word is to be taken now as it was then.


(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 128
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/29/2017 1:55:55 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

There are Muslims, there are Jews, there are Christians who all firmly believe in God, who know that the original books were meant to speak to the audience of those times and do not think that every original word is to be taken now as it was then.



Speak to many Muslims lately??

They absolutely believe in the Qor'an and the hadiths as if it happened only yesterday.
To them, 'the audience of those times' is now, today, yesterday and tomorrow.
Why do you think every one of them is told to learn it from cover to cover every single day from the time they can read - and punished if they don't learn it quick enough.


_____________________________

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 129
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/29/2017 2:14:30 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

ORIGINAL: longwayhome
There are no Sharia "courts" in the UK and what does exist is not illegal. People are free to choose to accept mediation anywhere they choose, and having gone through that mediation they still have access to the court system, which is based on English, Scottish or Northern Irish law.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/sharia-courts-in-uk-face-government-probe-over-treatment-of-women-a7049826.html
The Government is to launch an investigation into whether sharia courts operating in the UK discriminate against women – legitimising forced marriages and issuing unfair divorce settlements.
So here is your government investigating Muslims FOR FORCING women into marriage through their Sharia courts!

quote:

In this country there are many people who abuse women, as they do in Singapore.

This is lamest excuse ever. The difference is, Islam is a large powerful religion that supports abuse of women and encourage their followers to continue to do so.

Compared to random wife beaters who are NOT backed by any religion to commit their deeds.

Now which situation will cause MORE women abuse?

By taking down Islam, you would save alot of Muslim women from abuse for a start!

How many women does Saudi Arabia have alone? That could be saved?

Random Wife beater = gets jailed and punished in civil law countries

Muslim wife beater = IS NOT A CRIME in most Muslim laws countries

Another thing is, I was under the impression that all the Sharia Courts in the UK are ran illegally. BUT now that I know it is fucking LEGAL! WTF? Man I got no respect for the British Government now. Supporting this atrocity of abuse of women!

quote:

The point is that no group is all good or all bad. I just try to have some balance and toleration in the way I approach any religion. There are all kinds of subtleties and complexities to consider before you condemn millions of people.

So if you meet someone who is part of the Storm Front Movement, who loves Hitler and Stalin and think they are his idol, and basically supports all forms of white supermacy.

You are saying, that there are subtleties and complexities to consider with them? Okay...

To me, it's black and white. You either SUPPORT a murderer, a child rapist, someone who encourage beating their wife into submission, and mandate FGM for all female babies, and follow his teachings. OR you don't! It's not a grey area.

The only grey area I will consider are Muslims who are Muslims AGAINST their Will, since ALL Muslim countries have punishment by law for leaving Islam. So essentially, a huge portion of these Muslims people are Muslims AGAINST Their will!

Another reason why we need to stop praising and making excuses for this oppressing religion!




and what gives you the right to force your religion on ANYONE else?




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 130
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/29/2017 2:32:49 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
and what gives you the right to force your religion on ANYONE else?

I don't have a religion, so I don't know what you are talking about?

I am talking about a religion that promotes criminal acts like FGM. They should be call out on it!

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 131
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/29/2017 2:38:45 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
How does excluding the JWs or any other christian wackos 'favor' Islam, or say that Islam is 'better'?

Of course it favours Islam. Islamist HAS commited terrorist act EVEN in Russia.
Jehovah Witnesses have taken NO LIVES.

So what is this biasness?

I don't think any Christian Terrorist Group attack Russia yet. IF not I would suggest Russia ban those Christian sects too!

quote:

How do you know yourself that all 1.6 billion of the Muslim faith follow it to every last word when even they themselves can't come to agreement on much of it?

You gotta be kidding. The only disagreement they have are nuances, like for example, how much a woman should be covered? Some believe even the eyes and face can't be seen. Some believe that as long as they cover all their hair, body, but face not necessary. But essentially, they are still agreeing on the same thing. Women NEEDS to cover up.

Their disagreements are small nuances. But being Muslims, disobeying small details. Like Taliban would kill maybe a Malaysian Muslim woman for showing her face. Because those small difference is still seen as a crime. And take for example, the actual verse says that a woman must cover up all that is necessary, no jiggle must be seen from her body. So technically, ALL unless parts that is necessary to stay exposed, could be eyes as well, because Taliban simply build a breathing Mesh for breathing and sight, but people still can't see their face. They are in adherence precisely as what the Quran says. Malaysia interpretes it as eyes should be uncovered because women need to see where they are going and nose should be uncovered as they need to breathe. But technically, with Taliban's veil, women can still see and breathe.

Malaysia just didn't come up with the such an invention of veil that works that way.

quote:

The writings of the Jews and the Christians are every bit as wacko as whatever the Muslims have in the Q'uran, if not more so. So how come you aren't saying they all adhere strictly to the 'same word'?

1) The Quran came directly from Muhammad himself. HE is the source! The very person who invented Islam.
2) The bible came from various sources, not a single source
3) Islam is the youngest religion, IF there are the most accurate records kept, it is Islam.

To compare Christianity religious text sources with is a combination of soooo many sources combine into one book is totally different from the Quran where the ONLY source is Muhammad himself.


< Message edited by Greta75 -- 4/29/2017 2:42:37 AM >

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 132
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/29/2017 3:01:55 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

There are Muslims, there are Jews, there are Christians who all firmly believe in God, who know that the original books were meant to speak to the audience of those times and do not think that every original word is to be taken now as it was then.

Speak to many Muslims lately??


More than that, I've worked with a number of them for years.

quote:

They absolutely believe in the Qor'an and the hadiths as if it happened only yesterday.
To them, 'the audience of those times' is now, today, yesterday and tomorrow.
Why do you think every one of them is told to learn it from cover to cover every single day from the time they can read - and punished if they don't learn it quick enough.


Tell us how you know all this firsthand.

But don't stop there, tell us about black people and what 'they' think, about Chinese people and what 'they' think, about Indians and what 'they' think, etc.

I can be a bit the bastard on that account sometimes too, but I go by what I see and experience in real life, not the crap some of you idiots read.

Our experiences differ, to say the least. Not that I'm convinced you've had any real experience there other than from a safe distance in the first place.




< Message edited by Edwird -- 4/29/2017 3:04:39 AM >

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 133
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/29/2017 3:16:38 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
How does excluding the JWs or any other christian wackos 'favor' Islam, or say that Islam is 'better'?

Of course it favours Islam. Islamist HAS commited terrorist act EVEN in Russia.
Jehovah Witnesses have taken NO LIVES.
they have are nuances, like for example, how much a woman should be covered? Some believe even the eyes and face can't be seen. Some believe that as long as they cover all their hair, body, but face not necessary. But essentially, they are still agreeing on the same thing. Women NEEDS to cover up.


You gotta be stupid. You don't even know the difference between Shia and Sunni. Not many 'small nuances' there. There goes any credibility.

To compare Christianity religious text sources with is a combination of soooo many sources combine into one book is totally different from the Quran where the ONLY source is Muhammad himself.

Islam took much from Judaism and Christianity.

Let us know when you wake up. But it's actually better if you just go to sleep and stay there. The rest of the world has things to do and you're being way too loud.


< Message edited by Edwird -- 4/29/2017 3:27:23 AM >

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 134
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/29/2017 3:30:21 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
Islam took much from Judaism and Christianity.

Let us know when you wake up. But it's actually better if you just go to sleep and stay there. The rest of the world has things to do and you're being way too loud.


Yes but what you don't understand is. Precisely! Muhammad is saying that Judaism and Christianity does not have the most current information of what God Wants.

His information, His Quran, is the most updated and current VERSION of what that SAME God from Judaism and Christianity wants. And he claims his information is directly from Angel Gabriel himself who brings God Message directly to him.

So the 1.6billion people who believe him as the most authentic source, believe HE is the one carrying the MOST authentic and UP TO DATE And CURRENT message for the same God that Christians and Jews believe in.

He might have pulled off the world's biggest con-job, but he is successful.

< Message edited by Greta75 -- 4/29/2017 3:33:22 AM >

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 135
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/29/2017 3:36:07 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline 		You just previously said that Muhamad made the entire thing up all by himself, whereas the old and new testament came from "soooooo many sources," then now saying he (M) got it from Gabriel, whom introduced in the earlier books.

I don't know if even any god could get both of your fat feet out of your stupid mouth in the same attempt.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 136
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/29/2017 3:38:10 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

You just previously said that Muhamad made the entire thing up all by himself, whereas the old and new testament came from "soooooo many sources," then now saying he (M) got it from Gabriel, whom introduced in the earlier books.

I don't know if even any god could get both of your fat feet out of your stupid mouth in the same attempt.

You got reading comprehension problems.

The historical authentic history of HOW the bible was put together was the compilation of different sources.

The historical authentic history of HOW the Quran was put together was compiled SOLELY by Muhammad himself.

Where is the discrepancy?

Muhammad's ONLY source for his book is Angel Gabriel HIMSELF. Angel Gabriel is the same Angel from the Old Testament. So IF it was Angel Gabriel himself giving him the latest updates, why wouldn't it include things from the Old Testament? Angel Gabriel himself, if you studied how the Quran was compiled, went through thoroughly with Muhamamd the whole Old and New Testament to inform him which are accurate as per God's HIMSELF verification, and which are inaccurate.

According to Wikipedia: Gabriel in the Abrahamic religions, is an angel who typically serves as God's messenger.

Islam didn't get 1.6 billion followers coming in sooo late, after how established Christianity and Judaism is, UNLESS they believed this is God's absolutely latest updated accurate information for the Abrahamic religions.



< Message edited by Greta75 -- 4/29/2017 3:42:11 AM >

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 137
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/29/2017 5:06:36 AM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline 		Tell us again how a mere update (as you say) is all new and self-originated information.

You keep trying, it's not working.


(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 138
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/30/2017 6:40:34 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline 		ORIGINAL: Greta75
I highly doubt white men abuse women the most, since MANY Muslims women are decked in Ninja Suits from head to toe, so how many go unreported?

Arabs are Caucasians, except for the negroid and mongoloid ones.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 139
RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses - 4/30/2017 6:45:48 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Greta75

Christianity is filled with allegory, you can CHOOSE your interpretation.

If that were true then you should be able to cite some proof of that?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 140
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Russia offically bans Jehovah Witnesses Page: <<   < prev  4 5 6 [7] 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2024
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.070