Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Official Training Standards


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Official Training Standards Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 3:22:53 PM   
MastrVran


Posts: 354
Joined: 3/15/2006
Status: offline
I certainly appreciate your predjudice, misdirections and adding things not stated as ways to prove your points.

Lets use language designed to make it appear some things were said or implied and then use the made up stuff to prove this is all wrong. Nicely done and as I expected your response to be.

Many people online want to learn something, anything having to do with this lifestyle. Some people are willing to show them. Some just want to use them. Same as some people want a long term relationship and some say they do but are one night stands. I will not say that many if not most trainers are anything but. They simply have found ways to get laid. But then so are most of the Doms and Masters online. Just looking for sex and wearing a word they think will lead them to someones bed.

You can say anything you like about me lol. It just rolls off. Now if you knew me....that would be different. But then, so would what you are saying. So anyway, for the majority who will run this into the ground because it isnt how you think it should be done. Great. have a nice life. For those who have been with someone who trained them in something, and yes I mean Doms as well as subs, then you know there can be something gained from this. I will assume most people saying how horrible it is, have never actually been trained. And instead have been HNGed. Like Michaels ideas of train my wife in bed, misleading but cute, HFOGs, I really dont think you are that fat but using personal attacks never makes your point anything but worthless, and a Coach who has nothing to do with this lifestyle but is a Sports Leader showering with his team and lathering them all up. All cutsy but having no bearing on this other than to misdirect and try to make it seem bad. Lets make someone in charge of students a sexual pervert so obviously anyone who trains is sexual pervert by association. Another usual move of someone who isnt really making a valid point.

Should you wish to make a valid point. And address an actual issue that exists, then please do so. If all you have is this? Well good luck. lol I probably wont even reply again to more sillyness and innuendo.

I am simply pointing out that teaching people, whether at a club or at your home is nothing bad. Telling people they must get laid to be trained is not what this is about.

MV

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 3:30:51 PM   
SimplyMichael


Posts: 7229
Joined: 1/7/2007
Status: offline
Before this turns into a massive shitstorm I want to give MastrVran, a chance to redeem himself.  I strongly believe that education (implying a less "hands on" approach and in general, learning) is wonderful and important.  I am one who doesn't believe in testing implements upon myself, or bottoming to learn how to be a better dominant.

The way BSB feels when I torment or fuck her (and I realize for some here, that might be one and the same) the way she feels while I am doing it is different than another woman would feel if I was doing the exact same thing to her.

So, can you give us specifics of what this universal training you do consists of?

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 3:44:57 PM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick

They know how to sit up, roll over and play dead?

Cali



Or learn how to play "victim"

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 4:51:57 PM   
Missokyst


Posts: 6041
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
Ok, let's say your cause is nobel and you only want to provide someone with experience.  Great!  How did you learn to excel at what you do?  Did someone train you? 
I have often considered becoming a teacher of something.  I have a few degrees, a handful of knowlege, and am pretty good at learning new things.  How does one get a degree in bdsm? Or at least enough knowlege to become a random trainer? 
I can strip down and let people flog me (eh).  I can have someone poke needles into my flesh.  I wonder though, why would I need to be trained for that?
Kyst

_____________________________

pain is the breaking of the shell that encloses your understanding ~Gibran, Kahlil

“The truth is, everyone is going to hurt you. You just got to find the ones worth suffering for.”
― Bob Marley


(in reply to MastrVran)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 5:12:19 PM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
Whilst as others have stated or infered that the only person who can train someone to serve them, is the Domanant themselves, and I whole heartedly agree with this, there are some exceptions in general training. In some lifestyles, and taking the Gorean Lifestyle for example, it is possible for other Gorean Lifestylers to train a girl to global Gorean Standards.  By this I rfefer to those things like protocols which are the essence of the FGorean Lifestyle. After that each Master or Mistress must train for their own requirements. Notwithstanding this, in such homes where there if a First Girl who (as is acceptable with a Gorean Home, can be given the auythority to train other slaves in the general requirements of their duties in the home, which leaves the owner the pleasure of training and honing the slave/s in the final and more intimate areas of services required..

Mind you should anyone ever be silly enough to tell me that "here is the Official Training Manual and you will use it", after I have finished inserting it up their rectum, they will be told to dissapear and never return oif face things even worse....

Iron Bear
Master of Bruin Cottage
(A Victorian Lifestyle poly home)

"I judge a Man by what I see him do and not by what others tell me he does."
(Captain Sir Edward Pellew of the HMS Indefatigable to Midshipman Hornblower ~ C.S. Forrester)



< Message edited by IronBear -- 4/17/2008 5:15:33 PM >


_____________________________

Iron Bear

Master of Bruin Cottage

http://www.bruincottage.org

Your attitude, words & actions are yours. Take responsibility for them and the consequences they incur.

D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 5:16:36 PM   
SimplyMichael


Posts: 7229
Joined: 1/7/2007
Status: offline
Bear,

To me, you are a bright star in an otherwise black hole.  You are the first person to ever mention an actual example of useful training albeit in Gor not bdsm.

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 5:29:50 PM   
Noah


Posts: 1660
Joined: 7/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick

They know how to sit up, roll over and play dead?

Cali



Or learn how to play "victim"


Is it the phase of the moon aligning with the seasonal shift or something? Somebody goes along being a perfectly fine member of the body politic here for a frew weeks, maybe a month or two, then out comes this tired, sad narrow diatribe generalizing a cross a whole bunch of people he hasn't so much as met or even heard of.

A million people have Personal Trainers and are not called upon to declare for whom they are being trained. Firemen seemed to be trained without having to declare for which fire they are being trained. Equestrians are trained without having to declare in advance which horse they are being trained for. Teachers are trained without having to declare which particular student or class they intend to teach.

These facts don't seem to bother anyone, and yet a submissive who wants to explore and perhaps grow into an aspect of herself must--in someone's  Brave New World of Kink--stand and account for herself in this special way.

How interesting.

It is easy enough to throttle one's imagination down narrowly enough that one could envision a world in which the notion of training in BDSM makes no sense or is inherently abusive. This would strike me as a curious pastime, though.

Ignoring, over the span of years, many many insightful responses from many quarters which have offered to show how indeed training can be and is undertaken to very good effect is a pastime I would characterize differently.

Part of the problem for someone seems to be a carved-in-stone scruple about how it is immoral /abusive for anyone imparting training to engage in sex with a trainee.We are left to wonder about what youthful experience might have put this particular warp in a board which seems otherwise capable of supporting a broad range of sexual possibilities.

I guess these reliably periodic threads are a sort of public service. They showcase for us all the segment of the population who subscribe to someone's One True Way that training can be other than silly or abusive. But be careful about revisiting old threads on the matter. You'll find that someone is shown flipping back and forth regarding almost any particular aspect of his diatribe, almost always backing down from any particular he is carefully challenged on, only to re-assert it later, perhaps in the hope that his prior challengers  are absent that day.  Or maybe he just can't help himself.

If you're interested in being trained in some sense of the word that resonates for you, note well the individuals posting to this thread and their contributions and proceed accordingly.

If you're interested in finding a friend or partner lacking any better means to prop up his or her ego than to attack someone else's approach to kink a thread like this can also be instructive.

I don't recall ever advertising myself as a trainer. Like any other reasonably intelligent adult else I can see that claiming that status could help put one in a  position to do a great deal of damage, or perhaps a great deal of good ... kind of like the fireman, I guess. But then, does this not apply with exactly equal emphasis to someone claiming to be a top or a dominant or a BDSM sadist? In fact, does this not apply with equal emphasis to someone claiming to be a bottom or a submissive or a masochist as well?

 Barring the memory and psychological effects of some youthful experiences in regard to which we could all be compassionate, what would motivate someone to go through these cycles of obvious tumescence about the one risk while never being motivated to rant about any of the others?

The level of intellectual and emotional maturity indicated by adopting a position such as "Anyone who self-identifies with T-word is (insert derogation here) " speaks for itself, I think, when it is applied across the board to a potentially vast number of people for whom the word "T" might very well mean a hundred different things in each case.

When this Toxic T-Word rant occurs time after time, year after year, even in the wake of numerous testimonials of people who report that they have enriched their lives by means of the very thing under attack, the ranting stands, in my view, as a marker of  a sad weakness in the character of the ranter who might otherwise be an exemplary memebr tof the community.

My suggestion to anyone would be to feel free to enumerate the risks of anything you care to. Meanwhile, try to display the modest level of integrity required to resist the urge to paint with a wide and careless brush anyone who prefers to engage in kink a little differently than you do, or to self-identfy with a word which for some reason gives you the heeby-jeebies.



(in reply to Leatherist)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 5:30:53 PM   
IronBear


Posts: 9008
Joined: 6/19/2005
From: Beenleigh, Qld, Australia
Status: offline
Thank you Michael. My comments also apply to the Victorian Lifestyle and many M/s relationships based on service rather than BDSM. I used Gor because I had nere 10 years experience in the Lifestyle and it is something more people here have some basic understanding of.  However I too used that example because the discusions were regarding training a sub/slave to serve you. To me, service inplies serving which is doifferent to BDSM or Sex Play even though the service may be becomming the play partner. To some here, they will never understand the difference and others will see it as nit picking or semantics but to others, they will underatand precisely what I am saying for tyewy too have a mind set which required highly defined terminology leaving no room for errors..

Iron Bear
Master of Bruin Cottage
(A Victorian Lifestyle poly home)

"I judge a Man by what I see him do and not by what others tell me he does."
(Captain Sir Edward Pellew of the HMS Indefatigable to Midshipman Hornblower ~ C.S. Forrester)


(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 5:48:00 PM   
SimplyMichael


Posts: 7229
Joined: 1/7/2007
Status: offline
Noah,

I wondered when you would enter the fray.   

Training isn't another "kink" as you claim, if it was I wouldn't have a problem with it.  Saying "It gets my cock hard playing teacher, want to be my student?" is hot for many people.

That isn't what "trainers" do they don't present themselves openly and their goal is secret, often as in some who "rant" here can't even see it and THUS it is NOT a kink.  A kink is something you are open and honest about, almost by definition, bdsm training is not open and honest.

It is also NOT like being a personal trainer for exercise.  In BDSM, power, expertise, and rank are all eroticised and by definition, training someone else combines all three.  Schools have rules against fucking your students for a reason, you are in a position of authority over someone and that authority is used malignantly often enough that it is banned in almost all civilized situations where a similar disparity exists doctors, shrinks, teachers, counselors, coaches, etc.

In addition, REAL trainers strive to make someone their equal, in bdsm the sick fucks who run around calling themselves trainers are NOT striving to create equals, otherwise they would run around training other dominants.  There is a reason they don't do that.

When I start to see the vast majority of "trainers" stop wanting to train brand new submissives and instead focus on training same sex dominants, I just might change my opinion.

Till then,  your "rants" just make me despise trainers and their self deceptions more and more.

(in reply to Noah)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 5:54:37 PM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
Amen. It's the hypocrasy of fucktards proclaiming themselves "training masters" that gets to me.

Especially when they really have no outside refferals to back it up.

It's kind of like the "Horny guy with a camera" ploy.

Ya baby, strip down for me and I will take all of these professional pics for your portfolio."

But I have no fucking experience as a pro photographer.  I just say I am.

"By the way, it may get sexual at some point"

That's the part the retard WON'T say upfront.

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 6:06:28 PM   
Kalista07


Posts: 4240
Joined: 7/1/2007
Status: offline
It's amazing to me sometimes some of the fucked up shit i not only survived in spite of my damned self, but have forgotten along the way.....  There was a 'dom' i was interacting with at one point. He was going to give me a training collar. But, nothing more...Although, the expectations were for me to have sex with him and his slave...That whole concept pissed me off. i remember asking him why he thought i was good enough for a training collar and not a real collar and basically it came down to the fact that he thought i was too damaged from my past.....Although, aparently not damaged enough to fuck me and beat me..hmmm...
At any rate, i ended this (inappropriately) one day when i was angry and 'yelled' at Him through IM....Truth be told, while i understand i didn't end things appropriately, i know i did what was best for me now. He was delving into shit that He had no business develing into.... And as a result, it left me more fucked up then i was when he entered my life...
i don't know what's worse..Dom's who claim they are trainers...Or Dom's who want to have the authority to play someone's therapist......
Kali


< Message edited by Kalista07 -- 4/17/2008 6:20:07 PM >


_____________________________

“Love me when I least deserve it, because that's when I really need it.”
~~Sweedish Proverb


(in reply to Leatherist)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 6:07:53 PM   
Maya2001


Posts: 1656
Joined: 8/22/2007
From: Woodstock ONT,CANADA
Status: offline
I can see it as being useful when applied to certain areas for examples like pony /puppy play and  sissy french maids or sissy cross dressing training on how to dress, walk act and on etiquette were specific skills are taught. 

Here is an example of a training academy and it is basically about bdsm workshops no sex involved, the workshops are explained under the various programs for slave or master  http://masterslavetraining.org/purpose.htm

The example that SimplyMichael  gave is one I would avoid like the plague but could see benefits to attending the one  in the link I supplied whether as a slave or a domme  as far as teaching BDSM basics of flogging, bondage, hot wax electrical to a slave, it would help them identify in the future if a Dom does have kinowledge in these activiities and knows how to safely do rather than become some guinea pig


_____________________________

Lead me not into temptation - I can find the way myself

(in reply to IronBear)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 6:16:09 PM   
ExSteelAgain


Posts: 1803
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: Georgia
Status: offline
Agreed, Leather. For those tired of hearing such rants, keep in mind those of us who have been on here for awhile have heard about every discussion posted from both sides about 1 divided by 0 times. This tension between infinite cycles of familiar pros and cons endows CM with its particular form. I just hope I'm always on the common sense side and not part of the Applied Nothingness Theory.

_____________________________

You can paint a cinder block bright pastel pink, but it's still a cinder block. (By Me.)

(in reply to Leatherist)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 6:36:42 PM   
KnightofMists


Posts: 7149
Joined: 7/29/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MastrVran
Would I be sexual HNG if someone asked me to show them how to be fisted and I do? or would I simply be training them.  


One can be shown without actually doing it!

I recall a class I went to a few years ago.  A Top fisted a bottom while he instructed the class in his given techinque.  We as a class received training on how to do it according to this Top.   As I watched the bottom, I don't think the person was very coherent to what was being discussed or even how the task was being completed.  Of course, the bottom was very experienced in being fisted and could just enjoy the experience rather than worry about trying to learn how to do it.

Giving someone the experience of a given sensation (like fisting) is not training them.   Training is the learning a skill to give an experience or to receive an experience.  I am sure many like to combine these two aspects.  Teach a skill while having the experience of it at the same time.... problem is..... one can learn a skill... and in many cases... the basics of a given skill in this lifestyle can be learned without any vast differences from any competent teacher.  However, having experiences with another are often vastly different from person to person.  I find it actually a detrement to a person that is attempting to learn a new skill while also taking in the experience(play).  For a new person learning a skill that they are unfamiliar with.. they have to beable to differentiate between the sensations(emotions etc) of the experience and the skills need to have the experience... something that is very difficult when someone has no baseline to draw upon.


oh .... just as a note... the fisting was done on a male.

_____________________________

Knight of Mists

An Optimal relationship is achieved when the individuals do what is best for themselves and their relationship.

(in reply to MastrVran)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 6:43:34 PM   
Leatherist


Posts: 5149
Joined: 12/11/2007
Status: offline
What is being objected to is using "training" as an excuse for no strings play.

I have no issues with people doing casual play. I do have issues with bait and switch tactics-and lack of accountability. When I have trained tops on how to flog and do other forms of play-I was just showing them basic technique. I didn't do some silly ass thing like BEATING them with a flogger to show them how to flog.

Because then I would have been playing with them. And it doesn't matter whether I found it as sexual, or they did. Because I am too grounded in reality to rationalize that with a misleading *title*..
 
 There IS a difference.

And the difference is honesty..

_____________________________

My shop is currently segueing into production mode.

I'm not taking custom orders.

(in reply to ExSteelAgain)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 7:29:44 PM   
gypsygrl


Posts: 1471
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: new york state
Status: offline
I gotta laugh. 

I hooked up with a trainer once.  I don't have a huge problem with it, so it didn't put me off.  And, I kind of thought everyone incorporates some training into their dynamics and I'm the sort of person who, in other parts of my life, does well with a structured training model, rather than trying to guess about things--providing the model is sufficiently complex to take into account the subjectivity of the trainee(me). 

So...things between me and him moved along the way things tend to move along, but no training happened.  Periodically, I'd ask him about it and he'd tell me I didn't need it.  And, I'd be like, but...and he still insist I didn't need it.  I already had lifestyle experince, had an idea of my likes and dislikes, knew my characteristic reactions, was well behaved with decent manners...there was nothing to train me in.  I never pressed the issue too far but inside I was whining but, but, but...

So, even if 'training' is a bunch of hooey, a form of exploitation, ineffective for the purposes intended, or simply without purpose, it still gives me a good feeling to imagine that out there, some where some one is being trained. 

(I have the same view of public education...say what you want about it, but its still a pretty good idea and its nice to think that every once in a while, someone gets educated.)

_____________________________

“To be happy is to be able to become aware of oneself without fright.” ~Walter Benjamin


(in reply to SimplyMichael)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 7:50:33 PM   
ownedgirlie


Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: gypsygrl
(I have the same view of public education...say what you want about it, but its still a pretty good idea and its nice to think that every once in a while, someone gets educated.)


That was awesome, gypsygrl.

_____________________________

Good is the enemy of great.

(in reply to gypsygrl)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 7:56:20 PM   
gypsygrl


Posts: 1471
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: new york state
Status: offline
Thank you. :)

_____________________________

“To be happy is to be able to become aware of oneself without fright.” ~Walter Benjamin


(in reply to ownedgirlie)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 8:27:20 PM   
CalifChick


Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: California
Status: offline
I can train someone how to set a table fit for a visit from the Queen.  I can train the servers on proper table service. I can train the person tending bar.  I can train someone on proper table manners and what all the silverware is for so they aren't left with just a knife with which to try to eat their last course.

I can train someone on how to keep house, how to prepare meals, how to shop, how to keep supplies stocked, how to clean, basically how to be the "estate manager" for their home.

These are all things that I know how to do, that I can show someone else how to do, so they can do what I do.  None of it involves one person giving something and one person receiving something (other than knowledge).

Cali


_____________________________

AKA "The Undisputed Goddess of Sarcasm", "Big Bad Cali" and "Yum Bum". Advisor to the Subbie Mafia, founding member of the W.A.C. and the Judgmental Bitches Brigade, member of the Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's and Team Troll

(in reply to gypsygrl)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Official Training Standards - 4/17/2008 10:13:38 PM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
Where's Padriag? :)  Training is a wonderful thing, and someone who can do it well holds high esteem for me.  In the kink world is it often eschewed.  To me, the doms who say "only I can train my slave" either only desire their slave to do things the masters already know how to do and train, or just aren't very open minded.  For me, there's tons of things I suck at but would require a submissive to do for me.  I have no problem telling them to go be trained by a professor or higher learned and experienced person.

And I agree with Leatherist- what a lot of people call training in the kink world really is just a pretty euphemism to make them feel ok with having random sex and play. 


_____________________________

Find stable partners, not a stable of partners.

"Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Official Training Standards Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078