StrangerThan
Posts: 1515
Joined: 4/25/2008 Status: offline
|
The dynamic of any relationship is defined by the people in it. Master does not equate to the right to do as one wishes unless the other side of that dynamic jumps up and says, do as ye wish an i wilst be followin along behind ye wit me head down an me thoughts sorely upon pleasin ye an all manners o men that ye have me fuckin. In other words, there should be no assumptions and nothing binds anyone to assumptions when they're made other than the lack of common sense. Even if said assumptions are written in blood prior to the arrangement, staying in it has no legality to it other than acceptance of that arrangement. Basically what I'm saying is, some people need that kind of existence. Some don't. Some masters want that kind of ultimate control. Some don't. There's no gilded book of Advanced Domliness sitting atop Mt. Ararat that has been handed down over the ages and defines anything specific to kink as a whole other than it meet the needs of the people involved. If it doesn't, master has no rights and submissive or slave has no duty. Relationships dissolve everyday, kink-related and vanilla, for lots of reasons. One of the big ones is that one or the other side ignores the needs of the other. Being a master doesn't remove one from that requirement. It does however, grant an initial caveat that the masters needs come first.. I guess. I'm no one's master and never intend to be.
_____________________________
--'Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform' - Mark Twain
|