Mercnbeth
Posts: 11766
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus Okay, guys, here's my story. We have a Problem Child in my town. He's been around forever. He preys on the new young girls because the ones who know him avoid him. His reputation is so bad that he is actually hurting business for certain events, because folks won't attend if he is there! Naturally, this is all an "underground" reputation, because in the scene, if it's not prosecutable, it's just a bad date, right? He says all the right things in public, after all! Evidently, he is unteachable, or so I am told. As a female dominant, he has never ever done anything inappropriate to me, except demonstrate his utter lack of social skills. To other women, it's been everything from date rape, to telling one that he gave her herpes, to just playing so ineptly that we found his date sobbing in the ladies room. What would you do? Anything? How would you approach this person and show him that he is not being one of the good guys? I know that you can't make an asshole change his stripes (or whatever) but what do you think? I am not a blacklister, and I am in no way suggesting that we do anything like that. I'd just like to see this guy's eyes opened. Lady H, You suffer for the 'sins' of this man? In doing so you give him more power than he deserves. I'm impressed by the activity you describe in the Detroit 'scene'. Based upon your representation this 'dom' has the ability to have a 'sub du jour' at every event; even though, based upon your observation, he has a "bad reputation", "lacks social skills", represents he has "herpes" and left his play partners "sobbing in the ladies room". And yet he's still partnered up and corrupting the newbie pool - Damn! Does he look like Brad Pitt? Appreciating that newcomers of either gender and any orientation need some guidance you can summarize that guidance by saying; "take your time" and "know the person (or persons) you play with." After that - personal accountability and responsibility are up to the individual. The person in bathroom made a decision and is suffering the consequences of her decision. Who knows, the 'herpes scare' may have been the ultimate submissive, humiliation, scene. For one person to destroy or negatively impact a group; it requires group cooperation. If everyone who "knows him, avoids him" and he plays "so ineptly" eventually the talent pool drys up; 'Brad Pitt' looks notwithstanding. What would I do? Well, assuming I agreed with your assessment of this individual; I may make it a point to insure anyone with him has heard; "take your time & know your partner". Were I confident that the newbie was so mesmerized by this person and believed him the 'one'; I'd relate a couple of the 'horror stories', but only if I saw them first hand. After that, I'd offer the newbie a friendly "good luck, have FUN!"; because, by definition, we are talking about consenting adults. Whether at a club or private residence one person has the power to do something. A commercial venue in this economy, who has a person "hurting business" should have no problem excluding the individual. I've banned people from my parties for various reasons and have no problem 'chatting' with them so they know EXACTLY why. Is there nobody able or willing to do the same in Detroit? Again - why does everyone give him so much power? You don't need someone of the stature or 'Steel' - you only need someone with 'balls' of either gendar to look him in the eye and say to him; "you are not welcome". You are not a "blacklister" but obviously you have a list in mind of what a 'good dom' does and how a 'good dom' should play; and this guy's activities aren't on the list. If they are not on the 'list' of the majority of club members and participants he should not be allowed to attend. That defines 'blacklisting' but so what? If you want to call it 'responsible' or 'protecting the community'; okay, but you, individually or within the group collective, still blacked him off the welcome guest list. I've never been to a club where disrupting behavior was allowed to continue. The most strange was as a SF club where a friend of mine was told not to go 'sonic' with his whip. We found it a bit strange, but club standards should be honored. The decision is then a conscience choice; get blacklisted, obey, or leave. SOMEBODY in the Detroit community should be able and willing to have a 'chat' with this person and lay it out for him. However, is this the consensus opinion? Such a 'dynamic' individual can create a schism. He can have a underground 'fan base'. Obviously he generates contact better than most who complain about never being able to connect real time with anyone. Maybe he can put on a presentation about getting people to meet you and play with you at a club quickly? Remember, you know the consequences of those meetings not what led up to them, or the exchange between this "inept" "asshole", and the newbie. What if it went; "I'm an asshole with no social skills and very little practical skills usually associated with BDSM 'play'. However, I'm a sadist and get off on humiliation and 'mind fucks'; I may even claim to have given you a sexually transmitted disease. I can get you into a BDSM 'club' I belong to and if you like to go and see what its like, I'd be happy to take you and abuse you in the process." Is it still his fault? Besides, with limits and safe-words what can go wrong?
|