quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn
Which affirmation of is just what transpired here.

You were claiming that I wanted pitch forks, etc. Being that there was nothing to indicate that as my intention in the matter, I just called you out on your idiocy or otherwise lack of comprehension 'skills.' Yeah, I take that back; what you said was not 'kinda' fucked up, just completely fucked up.

Who needs pitchforks, after this?

What is established by all this is that you are entitled to go looking for whatever trouble you seek, and who needs a pitchfork. They give guns to people with a well established record of violence and pathological antisocial behavior. Which is a strike against every responsible gun owner.

Even if I had the intent you presume, I could get any gun I wanted for the purpose. Who needs a freakin' pitchfork?

Just because you openly advocate mentally unstable people carrying guns and harassing everyday citizens as a matter of course does not mean that people opposed to that dystopian scenario are carrying pitchforks.

Project much?

Ciao.

quote:

He said, “We must examine laws that take this further by eliminating the common sense and age-old requirement that people who feel threatened have a duty to retreat, outside their home, if they can do so safely.”

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

So have I. Has Huffinpoo been accused to paying women to make up stories?

Speaking of the Puffington Host, they just published an interview with Rachel Jeantel in which she states that she believes Trayvon attacked Zimmerman.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/17/rachel-jeantel-huffpost-live-interview_n_3610921.html

K.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

As an example, a state might try a defendant for murder, after which the Federal government might try the same defendant for a Federal crime (perhaps a civil rights violation or a kidnapping) connected to the same act. For example, the officers of the Los Angeles Police Department who were charged with assaulting Rodney King in 1991 were acquitted by a jury of the Superior Court, but some were later convicted and sentenced in Federal court for violating King's civil rights. Similar legal processes were used for prosecuting racially motivated crimes in the Southern United States in the 1960s during the time of the Civil Rights movement, when those crimes had not been actively prosecuted, or had resulted in acquittals by juries that were thought to be racist or overly sympathetic with the accused in local courts.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwynn

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

So have I. Has Huffinpoo been accused to paying women to make up stories?

Speaking of the Puffington Host, they just published an interview with Rachel Jeantel in which she states that she believes Trayvon attacked Zimmerman.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/17/rachel-jeantel-huffpost-live-interview_n_3610921.html

K.

Yeah, well, we've already turned it topsy turvy in that what was formerly considered defending oneself against aggression is now considered an 'attack.'


If I had the means to defend myself against pervs like Zimmerman (or in fact the pervs that actually attempted molestation when I was 10-13 yrs. old), I would have beaten the holy crap out of that MF, and pardon if a skinhead red sweatshirt-wearing nut case might not have come across as any different than Zimmerman (oh wait ... he was in fact a gun-toting skinhead wearing a sloppy red sweatshirt.)

Oh, shut me up, how could anybody be worried about such a thing?


Silly me.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Oh, Im not saying that will happen to Z at all. Just the idea that people believe once a verdict is in, thats it. That isnt always the case. I think the attitude that "its all done" is a ridiculous one.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

As an example, a state might try a defendant for murder, after which the Federal government might try the same defendant for a Federal crime (perhaps a civil rights violation or a kidnapping) connected to the same act. For example, the officers of the Los Angeles Police Department who were charged with assaulting Rodney King in 1991 were acquitted by a jury of the Superior Court, but some were later convicted and sentenced in Federal court for violating King's civil rights. Similar legal processes were used for prosecuting racially motivated crimes in the Southern United States in the 1960s during the time of the Civil Rights movement, when those crimes had not been actively prosecuted, or had resulted in acquittals by juries that were thought to be racist or overly sympathetic with the accused in local courts.

Sure. But Holder's own FBI found that there was nothing racial against the shooting. Had 45 agents pour throw every iota of Z's life. They even issued a report and all.
That's gonna look kinda weird, his own agents testifying for the defense in a civil rights case.

Not that it matters much to most people (Not you Taz, I know you dialogue), but the Sanford police and the Jury found the same.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Oh, Im not saying that will happen to Z at all. Just the idea that people believe once a verdict is in, thats it. That isnt always the case. I think the attitude that "its all done" is a ridiculous one.

Oh, I agree. Even should Holder see the light of reason, there are gonna be civil cases coming out of this forever.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterCaneman

It may seem cold, but there are reasons you wouldn't want to try to render assistance. One being that if you just shot them, and then are seen kneeling over them, it could be inferred you were trying to 'finish the job'. Another reason is that they might still have some fight left and a weapon on them and you could end up shot or stabbed (which you were trying to avoid in the first place). No, better to call for aid, and if someone else comes along, let them try to help. I know it doesn't seem nice, but that's the way it goes sometimes.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Oh, Im not saying that will happen to Z at all. Just the idea that people believe once a verdict is in, thats it. That isnt always the case. I think the attitude that "its all done" is a ridiculous one.

Oh, I agree. Even should Holder see the light of reason, there are gonna be civil cases coming out of this forever.

On all sides... however, the defamation one's are gonna be sticky to prove.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

You ever see a movie dude? You know, the old ones where they show the villagers attacking the monster with pitchforks and torches.
That's mob rule.
What I used is what people call "imagery."


I love how you put words in people's mouths.Find me a post,any post, in which I say anything even close to what you are saying.

You won't. You can't. And you know it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

I kinda think you're type of justice might involve mobs with torches and pitchforks.

quote:

I've been straightforward and consistent since post one.

quote:

So instead you manufacture blarney,shift goalposts,ignore the evidence,

Again-your comments re mentally unstable are completely untrue and manufactured. Further, who says anyone harassed anyone? We have no proof of that.In fact, we have proof of pretty much nada. What evidence (You know, that pesky stuff you ignore) we do have closely correlates Z's statement.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kana

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Oh, Im not saying that will happen to Z at all. Just the idea that people believe once a verdict is in, thats it. That isnt always the case. I think the attitude that "its all done" is a ridiculous one.

Oh, I agree. Even should Holder see the light of reason, there are gonna be civil cases coming out of this forever.

On all sides... however, the defamation one's are gonna be sticky to prove.

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Uh... its a fake....

http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/someone-wrote-nojustice-notip-on-a-receipt-at-restaurant-in