crumpets
Posts: 1614
Joined: 11/5/2014 From: South Bay (SF & Silicon Valley) Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze You must be walking like John Wayne... I wear loose pants, and my 505 jeans aren't expressly designed to periodically malfunction just so that the opposite sex can catch a glimpse of my lovely balls. I also don't wear a push-up-jock strap so that the luscious shape of my balls can look larger and more full than they really are. Furthermore, I am not contemplating surgery to have a "ball job", where they put silicone or saline pads to make my lovely balls look even fuller, softer, and more attractive to the opposite sex. Unfortunately, because I don't habitually wear clothes expressly designed to give women a view of my balls via periodic wardrobe malfunctions which ever so tantalizingly reveal the true color, size, and pulchritudinous shape of my cock and balls, I don't garner anything like the attention that I would like, so, I pass by women wholly unnoticed, even though I'm carrying a large secret with me everywhere I go. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze I always thought breast are just breasts, they grow on us like some guys have hair on their chest, it's just different to our chests, I don't find hairy or smooth chests a sexual characteristic, they're just men's chests. If you actually think that way, that breasts are, essentially, not sexual, then that's probably because you are not a man nor a lesbian woman. Clearly human female breasts have no other purpose than to be sexual, despite many women incorrectly stating that they're for babies to drink milk (this has been disproved long ago, and logic tells us why full-time breasts exists mainly only in humans anyway). I won't delve down the sometimes contentious evolutionary reasons that human breasts evolved to be full time, but I will note that ANY size breast has milk enough for a baby and that breasts only show up during puberty, as you're well aware. So did the hair on my balls, by the way, which makes the pubic hair a sexual characteristic that women, in my day, left alone. (Why they shave it all away nowadays is somewhat beyond my comprehension; but that's an altogether different topic.) Lest anyone be confused by my only-half-joking description above, breasts ARE sexual characteristics, and anyone who says they're not doesn't understand men well enough yet. *****Ah ah! That's not allowed.***** If full-time (after puberty, of course) overly large and obvious breasts weren't sexual characteristics, they wouldn't exist (and they don't, in most lactating mammals, unless artificially maintained, as in cows, for other purposes). quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze Your cock would be the equivalent of our clit, we don't walk around flashing it about, usually the girls who do get filmed and paid. Well, if we're gonna dive into detail, then a cock contains a urethra, whereas a clit doesn't. And, the urethra is pretty much just above the vagina, so, we'd have to say a cock and balls assemblage is pretty much roughly equivalent to a pussy. Even the ball sac, I believe, is equivalent to your labia (although I would have to look it up to be sure, if someone were to disagree). About the only things missing in this one-to-one comparison are the testicles, which are equivalent to your ovaries, which, in your case, are tucked away further up into your abdomen, which is not a sexual part of your body. So, pretty much, my cock and your pussy are pretty much equivalent. You have, of course, ADDITIONAL sexual organs, which are your lactating breasts. Mine don't lactate (not much, anyway). Mine aren't sexually aroused (anyone want to really piss me off, just start fiddling with my nipples - it's downright annoying!). While I certainly am aware that some men are actually aroused by nipple stimulation, in "my" body, the nipple is like my fingernail... i.e., totally devoid of sexual connections. However, I have never met a female whose nipples were devoid of sexual connection (I'm sure they exist, but if they do, I haven't met one). quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze Seriously, I don't get the whole fascination some guys have with breasts I don't get it either. They're just lumps of fat with a cherry on top. But, if you showed me yours, I'd have a hardon in a second, whether or not I understand them. We men can look at tits all day, every day, and every single teat is as interesting as anything we've ever contemplated in our entire lives. Every single one. They never get boring. Never. From puberty, until we're dead. Tits are sexually arousing, and extremely interesting to we men. And women know that, because they flaunt them in our face every single day. Almost every article of women's clothing is designed to promote their teats. Add a few items of underclothing to that list. And then add surgery below the skin. Women go to great lengths to shove their tits in our faces. Worse, with respect to the topic at hand, if you are flaunting your teats, and then you bent over, and your strategically designed wardrobe malfunction allowed me to see an inch more of whatever you have, I'd be looking. Even worse than that, I'd be looking for nipple. Yup. Nipple. Why? Dunno. It's just what we look for. Nipple. That's the cherry on top of the icing. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze As for cock cleavage in black vinyl g-strings, I hope you don't wear them to cocktail parties since you equate them with cocktail dresses, unless you move in drastically different circles, I don't think it's the proper attire... My point was that the raison d'etre for cleavage to be shown while wearing a cocktail dress is purely to promote sexual characteristics that men find desirable. There is no other reason. Not fashion. No comfort. Not style. It's sexual. Pure and simple. Do you dress per-pubescent girls that way? I hope not. That you might not think that a cocktail dress designed to show cleavage is promoting your sexuality merely means you're not a man, or more to the point, you don't think like a man does. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze You're not really up on fashion or female fashion, but most cocktail dresses tend to have cleavage, it's pretty difficult to find one that doesn't I know nothing about fashion. But, in this case, it doesn't matter. Cleavage has only one purpose, and it's not comfort. It's not style either (most women's styles directly promote their sexuality). As I noted, full-time tits don't have any other reason for existing other than to promote female sexuality. That you might not think so is understandable, but, rest assured, when a guy wants to touch them or suckle on them, his reasons have nothing (per se) to do with babies. quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyConstanze for women there are different dress codes and wearing a baggy t-shirt over a cocktail dress is generally considered a fashion faux pas. I fully understand that women's dress habitually promotes their sexual organs. In fact, women from the time they are teens often dress like prostitutes (we have been down this road before), because both are promoting the very same thing. In fact, it irks me when I see people greeting young girls and saying "oh you're so pretty" when they wear a frilly dress, as if dress is even in the least important. They almost never say to a boy "oh, you're so handsome". Sure, it happens (mostly from relatives who haven't seen the boys in a while), but, mostly it's the girls who get their "value" from what they look like. For boys, it's "You play football? You any good?". For we men, we tout what we can "do", not how luscious our balls are to the opposite sex. So, at a cocktail party, a guy is much more apt to wear his medals on his chest, than to wear a strapless gown that shows off his chest. If women look at "them", we're happy to explain each and every one of them, even if she does appear to be leering at our chest full of medals (she's much more likely to be leering at our fancy house, vineyard, and pool than our chest though).
< Message edited by M38284 -- 11/30/2015 7:30:39 AM >
|