BeanTwiceOver
Posts: 12
Joined: 7/25/2011 From: Canada Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BonesFromAsh quote:
ORIGINAL: BeanTwiceOver Number four, the reason this thread is a clusterfuck is that it started with people discussing their own personal experiences on exactly that higher level of thought, and then Hannah pragmatically pointed out that BDSM is rooted in the sex drive (though it was likely a mistake to have done that, I would have, too - the "we're more complex!" back-patting was nauseating), and people fell over themselves taking offense that someone was invalidating their personal experience/spirituality/sparkly magic/whatever. Feh. The original question was quote:
So tell me is it really about sex for most people? I can't answer for "most people", I can only answer for myself...hence, the personal experience response. I'm curious to know what makes anyone more/better qualified to answer for "most people" moreso than anyone else and why that would seem to negate the "personal experience/spirituality/sparkly magic/whatever" in any way? edited to finish my thought I don't think I can respond to this directly without losing my temper, so let me use a completely different example. I have some friends who love the MBTI. Some of these people would describe themselves as "Feelers," meaning that they believe their emotions primarily drive the decisions they make. Others would identify themselves as "Thinkers," meaning that they see the decisions they make as based in logic. Now, think whatever you will of the MBTI, but these self-identifications are valid in the sense that they are a short-hand way for some people to express their personal, subjective experience about how they make decisions and judgements. That's fine, and in that sense, it's not "wrong." No one would be more qualified to speak to that personal experience than the person in question. But from the perspective of human biology, it's completely wrong. None of us make decisions based on things we consciously think or feel, at least not deliberately; we all rationalize afterward decisions that were already made on a lower level. Getting offended about that because your "personal experience" is that you are a "Thinker" is ridiculous. You aren't even discussing the same thing. My point is that this discussion is confusing issues in a similar way.
|