MadRabbit
Posts: 3460
Joined: 8/9/2006
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LaTigresse
Master Fire, usually I have great respect for your words but I have to disagree on this point.
If a woman dresses in a manner that she feels comfortably fits her personality wether it be construed as "sexy" or not, should still not be an open invitation for sex. If so, then all the rapists that have used a similar argument for their defense would have a valid point. Granted, this is just my personal opinion, but anyone that would determine a woman's motives based entirely upon her attire is someone I don't wish to know. If I wear a fitted black evening gown with a low neckline and a pair of high heels it is considered sexy, it does not mean I want to have sex. Anyone that approached me with that assumption would be firmly put in their place.
I know I am a bit late into this, but I did want to comment on this.
I understand its your opinion and I understand where you are coming from, but I find the logic to be flawed.
If you saw someone dressed like a police officer, would you not assume they were a cop?
If you saw someone dressed like a firefighter, would you not assume they were a fightfiger?
As Dave Chapelle put it, "You might not be a whore, but thats certainly a whore's outfit and that shit is confusing."
In principle, no one's motivations and intent should be judged by their attire, but we do it on a daily basis to function in society.
If I were to walk up to a man on the street wearing a big white apron and standing in front of a hot dog cart and said "Your attire appears to be that of a hog dog vendor, but are you actually selling hot dogs?"...they would probably look at me like I was stupid.
Or as Dave Chapelle also put it, does it make sense to dress up in a police uniform and insult people for thinking you are a cop?
Women are the one's who display courting gestures and men are typically the ones who approach based on these gestures. While most of these gestures fall into the category of body language, clothing and perfume are typically some of these gestures.
If I saw two women sitting alone in a bar, one was dressed like a librarian and one was dressed in clothing that highlighted the body parts that were used to court men (breasts and ass) and my intent was of the sexual nature, I would, undoubtedly, approach the one dressed in the sexy clothing. It, of course, is your right to tell me that your not interested, but to judge me as "someone you dont want to know" based on the signals I took from your clothing is silly. Do you not want nothing to do people who make the judgement that a person is a police officer based on the police uniform he is wearing? If thats the case, everyone more or less falls into that category.
Finnally, yes it is used as a justification by rapists, but anger is used constantly as a justification by wife beaters. Are people who get angry automatically in the same category as people who beat their wives? Many people get angry without violence coming from just like many men who's motives are sexual approach women wearing sexy clothing without a rape coming from it.
The point is judging men as being "wrong" for thinking a women dressed in sexual clothing might be interested in sex has no merits. Majority of my one night stands when I was still into the "club and party lifestyle" WERE wearing clothing I perceived to be sexy.
_____________________________
Advice for New Dominants
The Unpolitically Correct Lifestyle Definitions
Obama is NOT the Messiah! He's just a VERY NAUGHTY BOY
|
RE: Why all submissives are all about sex?? - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread