slavegirljoy -> RE: sub vs slave (3/22/2007 12:51:25 PM)
|
i don't agree with these definitions. Of course, subs are not "pretending", unless they are enjoying the pleasure of playing out a fantasy and they are pretending to be a certain character, such as "Nurse Nancy" or "Loosie Lucy" for their Master. That can be very fun and very freeing. And, of course, slaves don't "lose" their identity. Their identity is that they are, a slave, along with everything else they might be, such as an employee, a boss, a teacher, a student, a mom, a daughter, etc. i came to my Master just as i am. i didn't become anything new for Him. He chose me because i was already a slave that He wanted to own. And, i always do, have done, and will do what my Master wants. Use these definitions, if you want, but i have my own definitions that work for me. This one doesn't work for me. slave joy Owed property of Master David quote:
ORIGINAL: Master96 I just came across a definition of submissive and slave on the internet. sub: DOES what her/his Master/Mistress wants! slave: BECOMES what her/his Master/Mistress wants! Now, if you agree with this. Does that mean subs are pretending. And slaves just lost their identity? PS. I can give you the link from which I found those definitions.
|
|
|
|